A senior health official from South China's Guangdong province
launched a
campaign for killing all civet cats raised for meat in the province
to eliminate a possible source of the Severe Acute Respiratory
Syndrome (SARS) disease.
Feng Liuxiang, deputy head of the Guangdong province's health
department
said the action to cull civet cats in the region has been
approved by the provincial government. Feng estimated that
some 10, 000 civet cats will be culled in the campaign. Civet
cats, the weasel-like mammals were, among other wildlife,
believed to be one of the most likely SARS virus carriers.
But the culling was already ordered by the Guangdong officials,
even before World Health Organisation (WHO) had confirmed
that the recent patient admitted for SARS symptoms, had contracted
the disease. It was also not known whether the 32-year-old
freelance TV station worker had consumed or
been in contact with civet cats. A SARS research team in Hong
Kong had previously carried out genetic tests on him and found
that genetic sequence of his virus was similar to that of
civet cats.
Is a similarity in viral genetic sequence enough to justify
the culling of these wildlife animals?
Valarie Tan asked the question to Sunny Lo (SL) Associate
Professor, at the
Department of Politics, University of Hong Kong
SL: I'm not an expert in this particular area. But I think
the Guangdong Provincial Government played safe this time,
because the last time the provincial government was heavily
criticised for being negligent and for being not reporting
to the central government for the outbreak of SARS. So this
time, we can see the Guangdong Government is making a very
decisive action to slaughter some of these civets which are
supposedly carrying some sort of SARS virus.
But last year, the WHO released a report, saying that there's
no direct connection between human infection and civet cats.
So why are they still taking action on civet cats?
SL: I think the Guangdong Provincial authorities have been
cooperating with the Univeristy of Hong Kong Medical School
and they have found that there seems to be some genetic coincidence
between the civet cats and SARS. So that's the reason why
they are deeply worrying about the outbreak and the further
spread of SARS in which Guangdong and even China cannot afford
to envisage such a scenario.
WHO experts have said that people are infected when handling,
breeding or slaughtering the animals and animals placed under
stressful conditions such as a culling instinctively shed
more viruses. Doesn't this recent move to cull civet cats
ironically put China at a higher risk then, since personnel
conducting the civet cat slaughter might be exposed to the
disease and increase the risk of spreading the virus?
SL: I don't think so. Because southern Chinese like to consume
wild animals. So here the slaughtering of civet cats is similar
to what the Government did in Hong Kong several years ago
when it decided to slaughter one million chickens which were
infected with H1N5 virus. I think the problem in South China
is that the birds chickens even cats all these animals are
potential virus carriers. So that's the reason why the local
government is taking such a decision. And I think it's a very
wise move. I don't think that it will really help the virus
to be spread to other people.
Are they taking protective measures when they go out and
slaughter the animals?
SL: I think the Guangdong authorities have taken precautionary
measures and additional measures to protect those health officials
who slaughter these civet cats. The WHO also suggested that
the Chinese Govt should take samples out of these civet cats
before they were slaughtered and the Guangdong governemnt
has taken appropriate action.
What will happen to these samples that they take out?
SL: I think the samples will be tested by the Hong Kong Health
Authorities together with the Hong Kong Health officials or
even the univeristy of Hong Kong Professors. So definitely,
the Guangdong government is learning a better lesson from
the SARS last year.
Do you think what China is doing now an effective method
of prevention? Or it just a plain PR tactic to show the world
they're doing something to fight SARS?
SL: I think this time the Chinese govt is doing very well.
It s something more than a Public Relations tactic. In a sense
it is very transparent very responsive move towards any possible
outbreak of SARS. The fact that the Guangdong authorities
have installed a kind of communicative mechanism tonot only
with Honk Kong but also with WHO is a kind of very, progressive,
postive step towards the prevention of SARS.
|