|
As Malaysia's polling day approaches, the role of race and
religion in voting trends was an issue that was discussed
at a seminar organised by the Institute of Southeast Asian
Studies, or ISEAS in Singapore today. Yvonne Gomez finds out
more in this report.
Race and religion have played a significant role in the development
of social order in Malaysia's post-colonial history. But how
have they also affected the politics of the country? Mr K
Kesavapany, Director of ISEAS thinks that the struggle is
now focused within a single race in Malaysia.
K: Until 1999, the element of race figured quite significantly.
For example, when election time came, the MCA will make its
demands. the MIC will make demands, and Gerakan will make
demands. But after 1999, particularly in this election, there
is no mention at all about the other races. Now, the election
is pure and simple, an intra-racial struggle. It is a struggle
between the same race, the Malay race, but of diffrerent Islamic
persuasion - the radical versus the so-called moderates.
Dr Abdul Aziz Bari is a Professor of Law at the International
Islamic University Malaysia. He gave his reasons for the increased
role that Islam now plays in Malaysian politics.
AAB: In 1970, I remember that the composition of races was
different from what we have today. In 1970, we had something
like 35% Chinese, out of the
entire population. But by 2001, this went down to something
like 20-25%, and the Malay population has gone up to something
like 60%. This is, I think, something one should bear in mind,
as a reason that the call for more Islamisation is getting
louder and louder. Probabaly, the sense of a identity and
numbers has an important role in this development.
However, Dr K S Nathan of ISEAS believes that the concept
of race may not
be as contentious as it appears.
KSN: Race is negotiable in Malaysia, but the option to decide
who enters and becomes a Malay, is left to the power elite.
Mahathir himself is half-Indian, half-Malay. So negotiated
concept of race being accepted in Malaysia, because he has
some skills, and his skills are recognised. He is able to
lead and so they admitted him.
Dr Nathan continued on the topic of political elitism, in
the Islamic context.
KSN: In any society, elites will develop. The masses, if
you'll pardon me, are asses. They cannot rule, so from the
masses, an elite group will develop. It's a question of which
elites really rule a country. Maybe in Malaysia, what is happening
is an alternative group of elites, with a more Islamic identity,
is emerging, to contest the post-colonial, pro-Western elite,
which may have lost a certain sense of legitimacy. So in any
case, if you destroy the UMNO-led elite of the Barisan Nasional,
something else would develop and this could well be the PAS-led
Islamic elite.
Dr Colin Abraham is a freelance consultant on education and
social development, based in Malaysia. He believes the privileges
for the Malays have perpetuated a negative notion of political
elitism in the country.
CA: When we talk of people who are protecting their interests,
who are using or manipulating the political system, including
the agama...who are these people? They are the elite groups.
And this elitism has continued from the colonial period. The
colonial system of politicisation and political parties just
continued, flipped over like a page. This perpetuation of
the ruling class of elites, of all races, but of course, mostly
Malays and aristocrats, and of course, the bureaucracy now.
So I think in that sense, it's a very progressive step forward,
that these elites are now being called upon to account.
|