|
From next year, motorcyclists entering Singapore from Malaysia
may need to have their eyes scanned.
Iris scanning is expected to tighten border controls, to
reduce instances of passport fraud, catch wanted criminals
and keep out suspected terrorists.
For a reaction to this, Yvonne Gomez spoke to Dr Andrew Tan,
a security analyst at the Institute of Defence and Strategic
Studies in Singapore.
AT: These methods of identification cut down on fraud, for
example. It prevents people from using false passports and
assuming false identities from getting into the country. So
that helps to cut down on illegal migration, or the ability
of criminals and terrorists to slip into the country.
YG: In your opinion, what makes iris-scanning superior to
other forms of biometric assessment?
AT: Apparently, it is possible for every person to be uniquely
identified using the iris of the eye, which has a very unique
signature which identifies a person. For that reason, it is
very difficult for people to assume other identities, like
using a false passport.
YG: This threat of terrorism has always been around, but
emerged on the world s stage more prominently after 9-11,
but why is that this technology is only being introduced now?
Why hasn t it been introduced before and why are the authorities
waiting until next year instead of introducing it immediately?
AT: I think the technology is still being developed. The
research into it, I think, was accelerated after 9-11. there
is also the question of cost, and the training involved. It
s not surprising that it has taken time for it to be installed
and be properly tested to ensure that it works. The technology
is still very new, actually, so while it was available or
being developed before 9-11, those events have accelerated
its developments. And it does take time to actually implement
it, and to ensure that the necessary training is provided.
We must remember that 9-11 happened only about 2 ½
years ago. It does demonstrate that the Singapore government
is clearly very concerned about homeland security, and this
is part of a whole series of very rigorous measures that are
being put into place to better protect Singapore against terrorist
attacks, as well as better prepare Singapore to deal with
the kinds of threats that arise from such activities.
YG: What about the loopholes in this system? How can the
iris-scanning process be breached, in your opinion?
AT: It does look as if it s going to be very difficult to
breach the system, given that each person has a unique signature
contained in the iris. It s going to be very, very difficult
for people to breach the system. I guess the way around it
to ensure you re not any terrorist suspect list. If you re
not on any list, then there won t be any way of knowing whether
you re a terrorist or not, even if you are who you claim to
be in terms of your travel documents.
YG: Earlier you spoke about passport fraud, so what sort
of people do you think are going to be kept out, with a system
like this?
AT:Well, those who are clearly on any terrorist list would
be kept out, including known criminals. But of course, if
they are aware of this, they won t bother to come in, in the
first place. They will send someone else who has a clean record.
So that is something that is impossible to counter.
YG: Does a system like this require the cooperation of the
Malaysians, given that it is going to be implemented at the
Woodlands and Tuas checkpoints, which border Malaysia?
AT: I think, eventually, it would be good if the rest of
the region had the same level of technology, as well as common
procedures for immigration and visas and all that. When you
have common procedures and technology and common ways of dealing
with the issue of transnational crime and transnational terrorism,
it ll make it much harder for transnational criminals and
terrorists to operate.
YG: During the SARS outbreak, we had the thermal scanners,
and they didn t actually slow anyone down at all the various
checkpoints. Do you think something like this iris-scanning
is actually going to slow down the whole process at the checkpoints?
AT: I don t think it will, because they authorities would
implement this in a way that would not hamper normal economic
activity. That s why I think it is taking this much time for
it to be implemented, because it has to be done carefully,
in a way that would not unduly inconvenience travelers.
|