|
In an effort to counter China's threats of war, the Taiwanese
cabinet will ask for a US$18 billion arms budget to purchase
arms from the United States.
But the massive arms budget proposal has been met with strong
opposition.
Senior opposition officials argued that the arms budget proposal,
to be spent over 15 years, does not fit into Taiwan's defense
needs.
Are opposition lawmakers justified in their claims that the
proposed arms budget was not necessary?
Melanie Yip put the question to David Zweig (DZ), Professor
of Social Science at the Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology.
DZ: It seems that Taiwan has not been spending enough on
military defense over the last number of years and it becomes
necessary to defend themselves with the kinds of defense systems
they're buying, anti-submarines, patriot missiles. These are
the weapons, and weapons systems they need if they were to
be attacked by the mainland.
The arms budget was first suggested by Taiwan's Defense Ministry
in 2003,and is now being proposed for parliament approval
despite China's fiery criticisms of President Chen Shui-Bien,
who is into his second term in office. What are your views
on this?
DZ: There have been many inter-force rivalry over the nature
of the weapons systems Taiwan is purchasing. But overall,
the Americans have been pushing the Taiwanese to buy these
systems and put forward their own defense. So it seems that
now is the time to do it.
In March this year, President Chen had not been able to seek
a referendum for building greater Taiwan defenses against
China. Shouldn't that serve as a warning to not further antagonize
China?
DZ: Taiwan is in a difficult position. If they do not buy
any weapons systems, then the question is does that encourage
China to consider a pre-emptive military attack? Part of the
problem in this, regarding the issue of the period it took
Taiwan to consider buying weapons. The United States, China
and Taiwan have ben talking about buying weapons for a long
time, and the Americans are concerned that the Taiwanese are
not taking the military threats from the mainland seriously.
And the Taiwanese are too confident that the Americans will
be there to defend them, in the event of any confrontation.
So the Taiwanese need to beef up their defense systems, at
least from the American perspective, as a way to deter China.
Beijing opposes any arms sales to Taiwan as it views them
as an encouragement for President Chen to declare independence
from the mainland. And yet, the United States, whom Taiwan
is acquiring advanced weapons from, has warned the island
is not spending enough on defense against China. What are
the implications of the US' arms transactions to Taiwan?
DZ: The Americans are doing this as a two handed strategy.
On the one hand, they are pressing Taiwan to increase its
military capabilities. On the other hand, they are trying
their best not to let Taiwan take this as a signal that they
can declare independence. The United States has openly said
that they would not want to see any changes in the status
quo. President Bush reiterated that during his meeting with
Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao last year. The Americans have been
quite adamant, opposing independence. So they do not see the
weapons systems as encouraging Taiwan to declare independence.
They might be concerned that Taiwan might do that and perceive
it that way. The Americans are sending a message that this
is not what they're doing.
|