|
Yet another Miss Universe has just been crowned. And no
doubt, there would have been another round of chuckling and
sniggering among TV viewers about air-head beauty pageant
contestants wishing for "world peace".
Indeed, according to a report in The Australian, the new
Miss Universe herself, Ms Jennifer Hawkins, had joked about
wanting world peace when she was watching the contest on TV
last year.
But the wish is no joke at all: The saddest irony about beauty
pageants is that world peace is precisely the most pressing
issue the world faces today.
As the fallout from the Iraq war continues to make headlines
and skirmishes and terrorist attacks flare up in other trouble
spots, the world wonders when the next major conflict will
surface.
I recall one day in Singapore in 2001, when I was sitting-in
on a meeting between a very senior official and a few newspaper
editors. One editor in particular, sniffing a news angle in
the air, was praising the official for expressing the view
that with the end of the Cold War, the world would never,
ever again see conflict on a large scale.
The editor, visibly impressed, even suggested running a story
to make this point to "educate" the public on this
"illuminating insight". Needless to say, this happened
in that glorious age before 911. What a wonderful time it
was, filled with hope and optimism!
It is now nearly three years since the World Trade Center
attack, but the sober sense of reality still prevails.
The official's sense of finality was misguided. The enduring
reality is that some level of conflict will always be with
us. These continuing shock waves are actually coming out from
the epicentres of global instability such as the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict.
And these disputes will never go away, because they are founded
on absolute beliefs, which can never be settled except by
divine intervention.
Why God continues to allow bad things to happen to good people
and why He does not show Himself to settle things once and
for all are questions no one has answers to.
Meanwhile, we are left with other questions such as: What
can we, as helpless mortals, do to promote and preserve world
peace?
It is unfortunate that our fates are in the hands of a few
individuals. They are the ones with their fingers hovering
over the "push" button on the weapons at hand, whether
these are massive military forces or just homemade explosives.
But the opposite is also true: People have a power they are
sometimes not fully aware of.
A good reflection of this is the drifting leadership in Latin
America. Ecuador, for example, has had four different presidents
in six years - with the democratic process throwing out anyone
who is not seen to meet the people's expectations, which are
demanding, impatient and unrealistic.
What kind of leadership should we, as voters and concerned
citizens, support to give us all the best bet for world peace?
Do we need the "tough guy" who is patriotic and
will not budge from an entrenched position on an issue and
is ever-ready to pull the trigger to defend the status quo?
Or, are we better off with a leader who is willing to work
towards compromise and consensus?
Someone who can and will be firm when needed, but who at
least starts off thinking that the way to harmony is to win
allies and expand the common ground?
Someone who seeks to settle differences not through the barrel
of a gun or fist-thumping at the table, but through sincere
negotiation - even if this has to be done over canapes and
cocktails, or closer to home in South-east Asia, over satay
and bandung?
Conflict is reduced each time someone gains a little more
insight into another culture and, so, increases his own sense
of empathy. This is something all of us, as individuals, can
work on.
On a larger scale, the quality of empathy is something voters
might want to look more closely at in their leaders. US voters
will have to make this choice when they elect their president
later this year.
Deciding which approach to back is a choice that each and
every one of us always has a responsibility to make.
Commercial motivations aside, the Miss Universe will be doing
her bit to make this world a better place, with her drawing
power to pull people to give to charity and focus on the needy
and disadvantaged.
She is at least doing more than the people who laugh at her
from their plush armchairs. It's time more of us did our bit
for world peace.
|