|
Since Philippine President Gloria Arroyos inauguration
on June 30th, talks on plans for a new political system in
the Philippines have resurfaced again.
Reports say that President Arroyo is ready to serve as concurrent
Prime Minister as the Philippines prepares to switch from
a Presidential to a Parliamentary form of government in 2007.
However, no concrete timetable has been set for the switch,
as such plans will still need to pass through Congress.
So, why the talk about switching to a different political
system in the Philippines by 2007?
Felix Tan put this question to Dr. Clarita Carlos (CC), professor
of Political Science at the University of the Philippines:
CC: Actually this discussion has been going on for
the past 10 years. In fact I am part of the group going around
the country, educating people on what these changes mean -
from an academic standpoint. But I guess that came out of
a political experience where Estrada was removed by so-called
Peoples Power and people had difficulty
keeping out governments, which they perceived are corrupt
or incompetent or both. But the 2007-year cap, I think it
is not realistic because Arroyo has been elected for six years.
So that means, if anything, it will have to happen after 2010.
But how will this system - this proposed system - benefit
Arroyo, and in fact, benefit the Philippines political
landscape?
CC: Remember she cannot be re-elected anymore as President
after 2010. But if she shifts to a parliamentary system, she
can still get herself elected as a Member of Parliament and
eventually as a Prime Minister. So, how it will benefit the
Philippines? I think if we can make our government leaders
more accountable, certainly, that will be good for us in the
long run.
For now, the goal is 2007, and you said that it might even
be longer than that - by 2010. Now, how feasible will this
change be, given that Mrs Arroyo will still need to go through
the Congress and such?
CC: Because there are two ways of changing the Constitution
where the Congress changes itself to a constituent assembly
and when you elect a constitution convention. It seems like
people are more inclined to do the latter - that is to elect
a constitution convention because they feel that the Congress
already has its own continuing interest to keep itself in
power. But, you know, the shift from Presidential to Parliamentary
is only one of the changes that are being contemplated. There
is one from unitary to federal and the change in the various
constitutional commissions - that means the electoral system
It will be a comprehensive change.
I also understand that if there is a change in the political
system from the current one to the parliamentary or federal
system, Mrs Arroyo will have to step down in 20-07 or mid-way
in her six-year term to pave the way for this switch to a
new system. Now, what is the possibility of Mrs Arroyo stepping
down if there is a change?
CC: I do not think she will do that. Plus, you know,
it will violate our laws
remember she is not the only
who has been elected for six-years. There are Senators that
have been elected for six-years; there is the Vice-President
See, this is the problem when Filipinos just change the laws
according to what they please, you know. This is where our
problems begin when the rule of law is bent here and there
according to ones caprice. It cannot work that way.
Arroyo legally can stay there until 2010 unless she is impeached.
That is the only time that she can get out before 2010. So,
if there are any constitutional changes, it will happen after
2010.
Arroyo has also big dreams and challenges that she has stated.
Given her six-year term and a slim mandate, so to speak, will
she be able to accomplish what she promised?
CC: Well, again, that is an indicative of
it
is more like wanting to be a good person. So, it is really
a goal and it is not as if it is only Arroyo who will make
that happen. She is only one person. If the Congress decides
to block, then you will have a continuing impasse. See, everything
has to roll into the direction that she wants and there is
no one who can quarrel with the 10-point agenda. All the numbers
there - the eight million jobs, et cetera
They are all
indicative, except that, of course, there is the populist
notion that these are things that matter to every Filipino.
So, she has to make all those noises, but I do not think
they are on the operational, tactical level. But I think who
would like to listen to her strategic plans? But all of them,
really, I think is to improve the lot of the 60 percent of
the Filipinos who are living below the poverty line.
With these challenges that she is going to face - this 10-point
goals as the President
now, in your opinion, do you
think that changing the political infrastructure in the Philippines,
will help Arroyo achieve her aims?
CC: Well, as a political scientist, I believe that
the institutional; structures are such that you reduce obstacles,
like, you know, the continuing impasse with Congress - if
Congress has a different political complexion from the chief
executive. Then to that extent, you facilitate these changes.
But if the President and the Congress are of different minds,
they belong to two different groups, they are always clashing
- then nothing will move. So to the extent, this institutional
and structural changes will facilitate that and so, to that
extent, they are good.
|