|
Muslim Americans appear to be leaning towards voting for
Democratic contender John Kerry in the upcoming US Presidential
elections.
Many American Muslims say they are in tune with the Republican
Party's policies. But polls show a majority unwilling to support
a Republican administration this time round.
They feel the Bush administration has trampled on their civil
liberties in the name of the war against terror.
By that virtue, John Kerry has garnered their support purely
because he is running against George W. Bush.
Howie Lim spoke to Associate Professor David Tucker from
the Political Science Faculty of the University of Melbourne
and first asked him if Muslim American votes would be significant
in this year's US Presidential Elections.
DT: I've heard that the vote will be more significant in
some of the more marginal places where the contest would depend
very much on how many Arab-Americans live in these places
but it does look to be the case that Muslim Americans are
anti-Bush at the moment and some of them voted for Bush in
Florida. That was a very close call and so he relied on their
vote last time.
HL: There is a growing resentment among American Muslims
and Arabs that they're being treated as second class citizens
by the Bush administration which as you mentioned they voted
him in 4 years ago. Is there justification for such resentment?
DT: Yes, I think there is because the scare relating to terrorism
means there's been a lot of what's called profiling. One of
the things that police and security officers do is that whenever
they check or profile people, they look at the queue and they
look at the names and people who've got names that are Arab-American
are often singled out for special searches or questioning
so that profiling causes resentment.
HL: Some America Muslims have expressed a sentiment backing
Kerry only because he is running against Bush. What can Kerry
do to win them over to his camp?
DT: Democrats are actually a party that's very orientated
to helping minority communities. Most of the minorities in
the United States have found the Democratic Party more sensitive
to their concerns than the Republicans.
HL: Then vice versa, what could Bush do to win them back
over to his camp?
DT: He could make more effort to signal that the war against
terror is not a war against Muslims. He has tried to do that
but he's not been effective but he could try a bit harder.
HL: The American Muslim Task Force on Elections has actually
been toying with the idea of endorsing Ralph Nader in this
election. What message should the Republicans and the Democrats
receive from such an endorsement?
DT: The reason for endorsing Ralph Nader is because he's
the only candidate that's actually anti-war. Both John Kerry
and George Bush have said that they would keep troops in Iraq.
Both of them endorsed the war and the invasion of Iraq. That
would be a signal that they're unhappy with the direction
of American foreign policy. Ralph Nader gives them a chance
of signaling that.
HL: One important issue for American Muslims is the abolition
of parts of the Patriot Act which they feel infringes on their
civil liberties. Would the Bush administration cave to this
demand just to garner the Muslim American vote and likewise
would Kerry promise this on order to secure his election?
DT: I doubt very much whether either of them would do that.
Both of them are trying to present themselves as strong leaders
who are going to direct the country against terrorism. That
would look like a sort of weak pandering for votes so I don't
think they'd do that. They both have an image of being tough
or would want to get an image of that kind
|