|
STATEMENT
BY MR YATIMAN YUSOF
SENIOR PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY (MITA) AND MP FOR TAMPINES GRC
Following
the September 11 incident, there have been worldwide reactions on
the possible causes and the implications on Muslims around the world.
In multi-racial Singapore the debate on the issue has taken a new
perspective following the arrest by the Singapore Internal Security
Department of 15 members of the Jemaah Islamiah (JI).
In
Singapore, the Muslim community from all walks of life have expressed
their horror, condemnation, regret and concerns on the terrorists'
plan to undermine the peace and stability of our multi-racial and
multi-religious life. These people - from political leaders to religious,
community and mosques organisations, professional bodies and man
in the street, have unequivocally rejected the act and dissociated
themselves from what the JI were doing. They were united in saying
that there is no place for such violent acts in Islam.
However,
a local newspaper recently carried an interview with one Mr Zulfikar
Mohamad Shariff, the chief executive officer of Fateha group, on
the issue. This attracted the foreign media's attention. In an interview
with BBC and FEER, Mr Zulfikar made, inter alia, the following claims:
(1)
that he spoke as a leader of the Muslim community in Singapore and
that the Muslim MPs are not the leaders of Singapore's Muslim community,
(2) that the JI members' actions were prompted by the "Singapore
Government aligning itself so closely to the US and Israel",
(3) that the Government are "propagandising the JI issue"
and "instead of just saying that these people are alleged terrorists,
they (the government) will just say that these people are terrorists".
By implication, he is saying that the JI members, who planned bomb
attacks on various targets, including the Yishun MRT station, are
merely alleged terrorists. In other words they are not yet terrorists.
I would
like to refute the above claims and tell you who Mr Zulfikar Mohamad
Shariff is and what he represents.
Mr
Zulfikar started fateha.com in June last year. The Straits Times
reports that he has about 20 people in his group. He is not a member
of any Malay/Muslim organisation, the mosques or professional body.
How
can a person with such standing claim to be the spokesman for the
Malay/Muslim community? Singapore is a small country and Singaporeans
know who the national and community leaders are. They are the best
judges. However, foreigners who are unfamiliar with the Singapore
social scene would take the report on face value and take him as
the voice of the Muslims. This is erroneous and must be corrected.
| What
has Mr Zulfikar done and where was he all these years?
How can he claim that he represents the Muslim community
when his behaviour while speaking at the Convention organised
by the Association of Muslim Professionals was such that
the officials were prompted to ask him to leave the hall? |
|
He
has repeatedly claimed that the Malay/Muslim MPs are incompetent
in protecting the interests of the community and Islamic religion.
The Malay/Muslim MPs may not represent every Muslim in Singapore.
No group or individual can rightly claim so. However, the Malay
MPs have in the past more than four decades, worked with various
Malay/Muslim organisations and the Government towards:
(1)
the betterment of the community,
(2)
creating the legal and social infrastructures to meet the community's
social, religious and cultural needs, including the setting up of
the Syariah Court, establishing Mendaki, building the mosques and
administrating the collection of tithes, zakat and managing the
haj pilgrimage, and
(3)
making representations to the government on the community's concerns
and needs.
Together,
we have created a modern, educated, skilled and confident Muslim
community and prepared them for the knowledge-based economy.
What
has Mr Zulfikar done and where was he all these years? How can he
claim that he represents the Muslim community when his behaviour
while speaking at the Convention organised by the Association of
Muslim Professionals was such that the officials were prompted to
ask him to leave the hall?
He
rejects the manner the Muslim Religious Council (MUIS) and Mendaki
were structured and managed. He said only the ulamas are fit to
be the President and Council Members of MUIS and these positions
must be filled through limited election or nomination from the community.
Through
his numerous postings on the Internet, it is clear that he is fighting
for the creation of a purist Muslim society without due regard to
the multi-racial and multi-religious Singapore. In doing so he is
bringing the Muslim into direct conflict with the rest of the country
and pitting the Muslims against one another, thus splitting the
Muslim community and undermining the harmonious relationship among
the races in Singapore.
His
postings on the Internet are full of bigotry. He used uncultured
language that is not acceptable. He called Prime Minister Goh Chok
Tong a bigot, the Singapore Government as racist government and
Malay MPs as cowards. In doing so, he is fanning the hatred feeling
among the people.
He
said that the JI members' actions were prompted by the "Singapore
Government aligning itself so closely to the US and Israel"
following the S11 incident and its position on the Palestinian issue.
As the Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has said, this was
totally incorrect. The ISD had acted on the JI members on 9 Dec
2001. On the Palestinian issue, our position as stated in the UN
was clear.
In
conclusion, Mr Zulfikar Mohamad Shariff is taking the Muslim community
into a dangerous zone. I would like to urge the entire Muslim community
to reject and isolate him.
19
JANUARY 2002
Source:
Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts, Singapore
|