Protectionism
Does Little to Create Jobs, Greenspan Says
US
Department of State
March 11, 2004
New
protectionist measures proposed in the United States would
do little to create jobs and would "surely" cause
US job losses if other countries were to retaliate, Federal
Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan says.
In
March 11 testimony before the House of Representatives' Education
and the Workforce Committee, the head of the US central bank
said that erecting barriers to foreign trade and discouraging
innovation that brings about job-displacement could somehow
temporarily ease tensions on the job market.
He
said, however, that such easing would be short-lived and "our
standard of living would soon begin to stagnate and perhaps
even decline as a consequence."
"Time
and again through our history, we have discovered that attempting
merely to preserve the comfortable features of the present
rather than reaching for new levels of prosperity, is a sure
path to stagnation," Greenspan said.
He
said US job loss continues to diminish and employment, "in
all likelihood," will begin to increase more quickly
as output continues to expand and new jobs replace old ones.
But
Greenspan cautioned that job turnovers will never be painless
and that the country needs to be prepared to deal with unwanted
consequences of the economic change.
The
US economy has shed more than two million mostly blue-collar
manufacturing jobs since 2001. This loss and more recent "outsourcing"
of white-collar jobs to countries such as India and China
have become a recurring theme among Democrats competing for
their party's nomination to oppose President Bush in the November
election.
In
March, the Senate passed a measure that would restrict the
outsourcing to foreign workers of many jobs paid for by the
federal US government, and some US states have moved to prohibit
the outsourcing of state government work to India and other
countries.
Greenspan
said he recognized a "palpable unease that businesses
and jobs are being drained from the United States" as
a result of the globalization and the accelerated pace of
innovation in the economy. And he acknowledged a "large
gulf" between the arguments of economists pointing to
the long-term benefits of free and open trade and the stress
felt by displaced workers.
But
he said that the US economy gains most from "full and
vigorous" engagement in the global economy and added
that the best way to deal with stresses and anxieties accompanying
economic advance is to ensure that as many workers as possible
have the opportunity to sharecapture the benefits coming with
that engagement.
Calling
education and training a "critical" element of any
move in that direction, Greenspan urged renewed commitment
to adapting the US educational system to the evolving needs
of the economy.
Following
is the text of Greenspan's testimony as prepared for delivery
>>>
|