|
President
George W Bush has linked a war with Iraq to a war on terror.
He believes the US must invade Iraq to root
out terrorism.
Certainly, in the aftermath of September 11,
no nation can afford to be surprised by terror's global and
brutal hand.
Security, be it physical, electronic or personal,
now permeates our collective psyche.
It is now almost a cliche to say the world changed
after September 11.
Change it did, but not necessarily in the ways
we think.
The world is still a dangerous place.
The United States has been a terrorist target
for years.
The global economic infrastructure it represents
have always been targets for violence.
Airplanes aren't any riskier, they have been
hijacked since the 1970s.
What September 11 changed is our perceptions
of the world. It was a call to action.
US President George W Bush said, " We resolved
then, and we are resolved today, to confront every threat
from any source that could bring sudden terror and suffering
to America."
The idea of 'winning' a war against terrorism
is as vague as the structure of terrorist groups themselves.
Detractors contend that terrorism springs from
mass perception of blatant injustices, and punitive action
alone will only deepen the rage.
If an attack on Iraq doesn't go as planned they
say, the prospect of massive civilian casualties could breed
more terrorists than it destroys.
According to the International terrorism expert,
Rohan Gunaratna, "... the support base of al-Qaeda and
other Islamist groups will grow significantly if the US invades
Iraq."
Already, driving Al-Qaeda out of Afghanistan has not ended
the war against terrorism, but made it harder to win.
Rohan Gunaratna also said, "Al-qaeda poses
a clear and present danger to the International community.
There must ba a multi-pronged, multi-dimensional, multi-agency
and above all a multi-national response to defeat al-Qaeda."
The eyes and ears of the intelligence
community must now be everywhere because trying to predict
the next soft target is almost impossible.
|