|
A new element reflecting
the evolving nature of the US war on terrorism; assassinations.
We'll take a look at one such strike in Yemen,
that is raising questions and concerns.
In mid November, President George W Bush gave
broad authority to US officials to launch attacks like the
one in Yemen which killed six al-Qaeda suspects.
In that attack the CIA used a robot warplane
to track a suspect Al-Qaeda vehicle in a remote corner of
Yemen.
At the command of the plane's ground controller,
a missile was fired, killing everyone inside the vehicle.
US officials insist, this type of strategy raised
no constitutional issues, given the "new kind of war"
the US is fighting.
But some felt the attack, which amounted to
selected assassination, opened up a controversial chapter,
in the war on terror.
In the November 4th strike in Yemen, an unmanned
CIA-operated eye-in-the-sky Predator aircraft fired a missile
destroying a car carrying 6 men.
The men including major suspect Qaed Senyan
al-Harthi, were said to have been responsible for the bombing
of an Aerican warship in Aden harbour two years ago.
Professor Bilveer Singh Political Scientist,
NUS commented, "The danger of this policy is this. When
you undertake a Predator type of killing, it's killing from
the air. In the case of Afghanistan what came out very clearly
was this. The US intelligence was not always good. They made
terrible blunders on the ground. They would attack, assuming
that there was an Al Qaeda or Taliban member on the ground
and it turned out to be wrong. And the result was massive
civilian casualties. In the case of Yemen because of the isolated
place, there was almost zero civilian casualties. But when
this thing becomes policy and given the green light then I
tell you it's going to backfire you know. In terms of revulsion
within the US, around the world, and I think it's going to
provoke more terrorism."
In the war on Iraq, experts have little doubt
assassinations will be among the methods used by the Americans,
to achieve their aims as fast as possible.
But if not used carefully and selectively, it
could mean damaging America's long term public relations.
|