|
SQ
Special Part One - Tragedy in Taipei
Telecast: 4th November 2000, 10.30pm
It happened
in a brief moment.
Just 11 seconds
after take-off, and 6 metres off the ground, SQ 006 came crashing
down.
The Rainbow
jet broken in three parts, all over the runway of the Chiang Kai
Shek airport, a scatter of debris.
The
tail was shaking from the wind. Eventually it started on the
runway and all of a sudden the plane broke apart. I was sitting
at the tail section -fortunately the last seat. The tail section
was completely on its side. We couldn't use the emergency doors
because it was several feet up. It started to fill with smoke,
and eventually there was confusion.
-- Survivor |
Confusion doesn't begin to describe the immediate reactions following
the crash.
Rescue work
began under harsh conditions in the face of Typhoon Xangsane. 78
bodies were recovered from the wreckage.
The weather
became the first blame in the search for answers to the question
why did the crash happen.
The
weather did concern me. I just had the sense, even the landing
was a bumpy one. When we were on the runway, I almost feel seasick
because there was so much movement on the plane. I did wonder
how someone would be able to control it
-- Survivor |
I
was in business class, second storey and I could see the cockpit
and there was no visibility. Visibility was very poor, zero.
So I asked the stewardess, if it was safe to take off. And she
said that they have flown in worst weather than this in the
past.
-- Survivor |
The first theory had been that a wind shear, caused by the typhoon,
made the plane deviate from its flight path, leading to the crash.
Said Mr Rick
Clements, VP of Public Affairs at SIA : "The decision to take
off was the captain's. The weather conditions was deemed safe for
take-off."
In Taipei the
Control Tower had given the all clear, not just to SQ 006 but to
other carriers too. The passenger who filmed the disaster was in
a plane waiting to take off.
Just 15 minutes
earlier, a China Airlines plane took off safely.
Now, the wind
shear theory has been de-bunked. On Friday, Taiwan came up with
the strongest statements yet to explain the crash: Pilot error.
The aircraft
had taken off from the wrong runway
Said Mr Yong
Kay, Managing Director of the Taiwan's Aviation Safety Council:
"The runway he should have been is 5L. The runway he took off
from was 5R."
While human
error has been accepted as a reason, even by Singapore Airlines,
some doubts remain.
"Apart
from working with investigators and airport authorities, we will
be examining all possibilities ourselves to discover what could
have led to this fatal error," said Dr Cheong Choong Kong the
CEO, of SIA.
Said Mr Clements: "It was unlikely that an experienced captain
would have taxied his aircraft on a darkened runway that's out of
use. But the aircraft was on the wrong runway. We want to understand
how that could have happened."
The airport
has three runways, two of which run parallel. SQ 006 was supposed
to take off from 05 Left. But its wreckage was strewn all over its
neighbouring 05 Right.
That, runway
had been closed for repairs.
The first reports
from the pilot indicated that he had seen an object and had hit
it on take off.
"We had
reported ourselves in an earlier news release that the captain hit
an object in a runway. That's all we can say at the moment,"
said Mr Clements.
Construction
equipment on the closed runway, is what investigators think could
have been what SQ 006 hit.
The Chiang Kai Shek airport is not equipped with ASDA, a radar which
allows the control tower to monitor the route a plane is taking
on the ground.
Initial investigations
have cleared the control tower of misdirecting the pilot.
But to a question
of whether the control tower could see the aircraft clearly, the
answer was No, according to Mr Yong Kay.
According to
Taiwan authorities, the correct runway, 05Left was well-lit despite
some damage by an earlier plane accident. But there are still uncertainties
over whether the pilot could be misled by the lights.
Said Mr Yong
Kay: "Centre lights has been green all along."
The investigations now underway may take some time in unraveling
those crucial few seconds before life for everyone linked to SQ
006 was changed forever.
"Once the
answer can be established, we will take whatever action necessary
to ensure this tragic accident doesn't happen again. There are lessons
to be learnt and we need to understand what they are. We fully accept
the responsibility to passengers, crew and families. This is a terrible
tragedy," said Dr Cheong.
But still questions
remain: How could an experienced pilot end up on the wrong runway?
Could he see clearly? Could the control tower or even pilots of
other planes waiting for take off given a warning?
How could a
Right, be so wrong?
Families
begin the grim task of identifying the remains>>
|