- POSTED: 10 Sep 2013 19:03
This graph is an experimental feature that tracks number of views over time.
Syria supports Russia's proposal for the UN atomic agency to assess the risks posed by any US-led airstrikes hitting a small research reactor outside Damascus, Syria's ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on Tuesday.
VIENNA: Syria supports Russia's proposal for the UN atomic agency to assess the risks posed by any US-led airstrikes hitting a small research reactor outside Damascus, Syria's ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on Tuesday.
"We join strongly the Russian Federation demand requesting analysis from the IAEA on the risk of such an attack on the facilities," Bassam al-Sabbagh told reporters.
"Also we assure the (IAEA) director general (Yukiya) Amano that the IAEA has the mandate and the responsibility" to conduct the analysis, he said at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna.
The United States opposes the IAEA carrying out what its ambassador on Monday called a "highly speculative investigation", saying it lay outside the watchdog's responsibilities.
Western diplomats in Vienna see Russia's move as an attempt to throw an obstacle in the way of Washington carrying out strikes on Syria in response to an alleged chemical weapons attack on August 21 in the Damascus suburbs.
Experts also say that Moscow's assertion that the effects of airstrikes hitting the Miniature Neutron Source Reactor (MNSR) could be "catastrophic" is exaggerated.
Robert Kelley from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) said the core of the research reactor, in desert some 15 kilometres (nine miles) outside the Damascus city limits, "is about the size of a can of paint".
"If the building were somehow attacked, the reactor is at the bottom of a deep well. Unless the bomb went exactly down this narrow well, the result would be to collapse the building and earth on the reactor where it would sit doing absolutely nothing until someone could dig it up again," Kelley told AFP.
"There would be zero effects on the local area. There will be no casualties and no contamination of the local area ... Bombing the reactor probably makes it safer."
He added, however, that it is also the site of a large food irradiation facility using powerful gamma sources -- probably in shielded vaults above ground -- to sterilise food, largely dates.
If these were scattered by a bombing this would represent a local hazard and necessitate a "nasty clean-up" of the immediate vicinity of hundreds of metres (yards), he said.
The IAEA has said it is considering the Russian request. Amano said on Monday that the reactor contained around one kilo (two pounds) of highly-enriched uranium, calling this "not a big amount".