| "We should not condem all charities
or even NKF as such things are not inevitable. We cannot expect
charities to run on air. Workers of such organisation have their
own families to feed as well. Expecting 100% of the donation
going to helping the people is not possible at all. But minimising
operational costs will certainly go a longer way. Look at the
SPCA for example. The buildings and offices are so run down.
Taps are little too old. Don't even think of new taps or "gold-plated"
ones. Animals and people alike, in that they need help. We should
not link everything together just because of 1 person's doings.
Steping down will not please us, what people need is a firm
body to overlook the running of NKF in future to ensure a higher
percentage of funds is going to help the patients." - keppy
"I think Singapore should consider having a single charity
and delegate percentage of donation funds to every single
home and community each year. It is better than to have so
many charities programme running over the year, having students
going round the city a few times a week and actors/actresses
being circus stars. We are growing and this incident is something
we must learn from." - saun_devil
"The fundamental problem with NKF is that it combines
two completely different functions of fundraising together
with the provision of health services. Transparency issues
aside, I don't think anybody can take it away from NKF for
its fundraising abilities. Like many non-profit organisations
in the US, NKF follows a very corporate and commercial style
of management with tangible targets (and probably even targets
for amount to be raised each year), and has certainly performed
this part of its function well. On the other hand, what is
lacking is how it uses the massive fund it raises for the
provision of dialysis services (and now even other medical
services). The extension of the calculative and exacting corporate
culture of NKF to run dialysis services is exactly what is
causing the problem. The only way to resolve this is to spin
off the provision of health services to a separate organisation
(probably even a stat board or under the wing of the MOH).
At the end of the day, I urge all to not lose your faith in
charitable organisations, including the new NKF that will
emerge from this whole fiscao. We should punish the people
running the organisation, but not the patients whom the organisations
existed for in the very first place." - mystic
"Is qutting the best thing to do when you need to do
the right thing to win back public trust? My take, it isn't.
If the CEO and the Board is willing to part with a portion
of their huge pay checks and donate it back to the cause,
I will believe that they meant well after all. In my humble
opinion, so will the public." - CyberRoach
"My question is, why is there no apology from NKF? The
immediate things to
take care of is no doubt public confidence and continuity
of donations to the really needy organisation. But what should
NKF do now? Dump the ship and
leave all the mess behind?" - blkoh
"I understand the primary objective of the NKF, which
is to provide medical assistance to the needy, especially
kidney patients. And I understand the present issue has negative
repercussions on your patients. But I feel that it is not
right to downplay the seriousness of this matter. NKF has
enough funds for all its patients to last for a significant
period of time. Please do not divert the publics attention
from the misuse of public donations of NKF management to the
needs of kidney patients." - tribetta
"I think the government should have some regulations
for charities with millions dollars of donation. If the government
is concerned with donation and funding to political parties,
why not charities. Even public listed companies can have accounting
problems." - Iceman
"Despite their stepping down and new board and CEO coming,
I still highly suggest current donors to stop all their future
donations to NKF... It is a good opportunity for current donors
to re-consider various other charitable organisation, as all
the funds to assist only 2000 patients is definitely not healthy,
lets share the pie. Do remember why only 2000 patient can
benefit, why not the 10,000 not so well to do families, forgotten
aged Singaporean and how about the millions of peolpe worldwide
without food, clothings and home." - Guan
"NKF has created a phenomenon in evoking these compassion
and empathies in all of us in helping those less fortunate
than us. These has been no easy task which requires relentless
driving force. Without a doubt, such are the success and contribution
of the man. Granted that they have provided erroneous facts
to the press which might have misled the public. However,
in my personal opinion, with greater transparency and Durai
at the helm, NKF would continue to be a dynamic organisation
in driving charitable cause and reaching out to more. Such
as the cancer patients and their families." - orangemuscat
"From what I, as an individual public and donor see
is that, the sick and needy ie. kidney and cancer patients
in need of help, are receiving the necessary help and support
they are looking for. Isn't that truly consoling and comforting
to know that there is love and graciousness in our country,
Singapore. We are a young country, what kind of lesson would
we like to teach our young generation through this incident.
Are we going to tell our young that when a person does something
wrong in the eyes of men, we should condemn him despite of
what he/she had contributed to the society over the years;
or are we going to teach them to forgive and do some thinking
and learn something from it. No matter what the outcome this
incident will become, I will continue to support NKF n Mr
Durai as well as the board and staff together with the patients
in need of NKF's help." - sharon
"Very, very disappointed. I will still work hard and
donate money to charities, but I hope the government can step
in to regulate these charities. The government cant provide
enough social welfare to help the poor, the sick and the needy,
economic theory just dont provide or justify enough government
intervention. the least the government could do is to facilitate
the re-channeling of funds. I won't stop giving to charities,
but i kinda dont trust these charities now. NKF really changed
my opinion." - Scooby
"This episode has provided Singaporeans an opportunity
to take a second look at how charities are run here and elsewhere.
I hope my fellow Singaporeans will not forget about this incident
in a few months, but to remember to demand more accountability
from other charities as well. By doing so, standards will
improve and needy folks that we want to help will be better
served in the long run." - johnjohn
"I believe the right thing for the NKF to do now is to
operate at a deficit for the next years, and let the patients
have more subsidies. This will bring back from public faith
on good use of donated funds. It is pointless to have sulplus
due to the large reserves on hand. It would be beneficial
to regain public faith and confidence if this were to be extended
for 10-15 years before having a balanced sheet." - kevinlaikf
"I won't donate to NKF even if there is a CEO and management
change, NKF has became more like a commercial organisation
and profits from public donations.. I would only resume donating
to NKF if there are more transparency in the organisation."
- kaufmann
"Since the reserves can last for
30 years at least, NKF should stop solicting for any more
donations in the next 5 years. Within this 5 years, they should
also take steps to show more accountability and transparency
in their operations. TT Durai and the board members owe its
donors and supporters a public apology." - damienic
"Will it be harder for charities now to
gain donations and trust from the public? Are we going to
have the same standard of expection to all charities to disclose
their CEO's salaries? With all the outbursts of emotions,
who can the needy depend on now?" - Pckesther
"The long term implication of the incident
would smear the confidence of the charitable people towards
the needy on a greater scale. Once bitten twice shy, the local
community will be now be more cautious than ever before they
fork out the money towards other charitable organisations
genuine to a noble cause." - Fisheye
"Words cannot express the deep disappointment
felt by everyone who has donated to the NKF. All donors are
deeply wounded by the behaviour of the NKF executives and
board of directors. The sheer lack of cost management and
questionable conduct used to raise funds have undermined any
confidence I had that the majority of the funds goes to the
sick people. From now on, when I donate $1, how do I know
that at least 80% of it goes to the sick and needy and 20%
or less to the administrative costs?" - JPN
"If you wish to stop donating to the NKF
from now, that is really your choice. But think: If every
Singaporean thinks this way, what is to become of the kidney
patients? Will there come a day when they will be helpless
again once the NKF has no more means to support their treatment?
Who then, or which body in Singapore will be prepared to take
over this responsibility of treating them?" - Level headed
|