|
Our viewers say
"The fundamental problem with NKF is that it combines
two completely different functions of fundraising together
with the provision of health services. Transparency issues
aside, I don't think anybody can take it away from NKF for
its fundraising abilities. ... I urge all to not lose your
faith in charitable organisations, including the new NKF that
will emerge from this whole fiasco. We should punish the people
running the organisation, but not the patients whom the organisations
existed for in the very first place." - mystic
"Is qutting the best thing to do when you need to do
the right thing to win back public trust? My take, it isn't.
If the CEO and the Board is willing to part with a portion
of their huge pay checks and donate it back to the cause,
I will believe that they meant well after all. In my humble
opinion, so will the public." - CyberRoach
"My question is, why is there no apology from NKF? The
immediate things to take care of is no doubt public confidence
and continuity of donations to the really needy organisation.
But what should NKF do now? Dump the ship and leave all the
mess behind?" - blkoh
"I understand the primary objective of the NKF, which
is to provide medical assistance to the needy, especially
kidney patients. And I understand the present issue has negative
repercussions on your patients. But I feel that it is not
right to downplay the seriousness of this matter. NKF has
enough funds for all its patients to last for a significant
period of time. Please do not divert the publics attention
from the misuse of public donations of NKF management to the
needs of kidney patients." - tribetta
"I think the government should have some regulations
for charities with millions dollars of donation. If the government
is concerned with donation and funding to political parties,
why not charities. Even public listed companies can have accounting
problems." - Iceman |