blogs  
 
yournews
   
 
Video Photos Finance Travel Weather Discussion TV Shows
| |
 
  Home ›
 
Reviews

 

What were you thinking, mate?
By Genevieve Loh, TODAY | Posted: 24 December 2008 1107 hrs

 
 
Photos  of

   
 
Related News
No future collaborations between Kidman and Luhrmann
Nicole Kidman warned after breaking Aboriginal taboo: report
Blockbuster tourism hopes for new 'Australia' movie


RATING:

SINGAPORE: It is the long-awaited epic romance from "Moulin Rouge" director Baz Luhrmann - his impassioned love letter to his homeland Australia.

But as evident as Luhrmann’s blood, sweat and love is on screen, "Australia" ends up being more of a belaboured effort thanks to its drawn-out pacing and overcooked melodrama.

Luhrmann’s muse Nicole Kidman (back in uptight "The Others" mode) is tailor-made to play fish-out-of-water British aristocrat Lady Sarah Ashley who, in 1939, travels all the way to outback Australia to find her husband murdered and herself the new boss of his cattle station. She’s forced to work with the one man her husband trusts, rough-and-ready Drover (sex-on-legs Hugh Jackman), in order to save the business and compete for a lucrative contract to provide cattle to the army.

Along the way, she also takes under her wing half-caste Aboriginal boy Nullah (Brandon Walters) whose grandfather, an Aboriginal elder with magical powers, has been framed for her husband’smurder.

Australia is maddeningly slow and obtuse at times, and dramatically captivating at others. Even with an old-school set-up and A-list goodlookers delivering big performances (with surprising chemistry) that would not be out of place in a 1930s Hollywood epic, Luhrmann’s overextension and inability to let go of a tediously superfluous final act prevents Australia from becoming the classic it had the potential to be.

The initial frolicking fun is juxtaposed nicely against the sensitive exploration ofaboriginal traditions, and is captured beautifully in the earlier expansive visuals and action.

However, just when the music swells and you think the credits are coming, Luhrmann adds a “second” movie that does nothing to spice up the increasingly predictable proceedings of the almost three-hour-long film.

Had he left us with his leading lady and studly man in that passionate rain-soaked kiss,Luhrmann would have given us a highly satisfying cinematic experience and extraordinarily beautiful showcase of his beloved Land Down Under. -
TODAY/sh

 


Other reviews
The Wedding Diary: A delightful union
A Dangerous Method: Unsettling and thought-provoking
Dance Dance Dragon: Starting the Year of the Dragon with a laugh
We Not Naughty: Too much baggage, not enough fun
Flying Swords of Dragon Gate: A new wu xia classic
Sherlock Holmes, A Game of Shadows: Rollicking good fun with likeable stars
Alvin and the Chipmunks, Chipwrecked: Humour strictly for the kids
Mission Impossible, Ghost Protocol: Impossible to miss
Already Famous: Lacks polish but has a lot of heart
Puss In Boots: An all-round family pleaser
Kaiji 2: Gambling thrills galore
The Adventures of Tintin, The Secret of the Unicorn: A visual adventure
In Time: Could do with a better story
Footloose: Get your groove on!
Snow Flower and the Secret Fan: Fails to move

 

 
Affiliate Sites:
 
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise with Us  |  Terms & Conditions