blogs  
 
yournews
   
 
Video Photos Finance Travel Weather Discussion TV Shows
| |
 
  Home ›
 
Singapore News

 

Nets fee hike: Case of unfair monopoly?
By Lin Yanqin, TODAY | Posted: 05 June 2007 0948 hrs

  New NETS Logo
 
Photos  of

   
 


SINGAPORE: It may not seem, at first, to affect your pocket directly.

But when the Network of Electronic Transfers (Nets) raises its levy on businesses offering it as a mode of payment, the increased burden on retailers could lead to higher prices for consumers, warned the Consumers Association of Singapore (Case).

At a press conference yesterday, Case president Yeo Guat Kwang minced no words in calling the three- to four-fold increase by Nets “unacceptable” and “monopolistic”.

The watchdog is even considering the possibility of bringing the matter up to the Competition Commission Singapore, the statutory board monitoring fair competition here.

“About 80 per cent of HDB retail outlets accept Nets and no other debit cards or credit cards,” said Mr Yeo. “Even government agencies accept Nets as a mode of payment.”

He added: “They have been given this monopolistic mode of operation because we see this as a basic infrastructure, to provide a basic mode of payment for all Singaporeans. So, they can’t just come out and tell Singaporeans now ‘I see this as ... a commercial decision’.”

Nets chief executive officer Poh Mui Hoon said Nets needed to respond effectively to competition, by paying the interchange fee card-issuers expect from facilities like Nets.

Elsewhere in the world, domestic debit networks similar to Nets have been overtaken by international debit networks offering higher returns to card-issuers, Ms Poh added.

But Mr Yeo disagreed with the justifications. “They should consider other cost-saving methods (rather than increase the levy),” he pointed out. “And what happens when other debit and credit cards adjust their fees upward? Will Nets do the same?”

And it is not as if retailers can simply stop offering Nets as a mode of payment, even if they want to.

“If most of our customers usually pay through Nets, we have to continue,” said Mr Lawrence Liow, president of the Association of Small and Medium Enterprises. “Then it becomes a matter of who will ultimately bear the cost.”

While retailers are not allowed to transfer the extra fee directly to consumers under the Nets service agreement, Case vice-president Lim Biow Chuan pointed out the cost could be passed on in many ways. “It doesn't look like it will affect us but ultimately it will,” he said. “Retailers can also tell customers to pay by cash, or pay more to use Nets.”

When contacted, the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry — which had initiated a dialogue with Nets over the increase in February — said both sides were still in negotiations.

To help retailers adjust, Nets will implement the hike in stages, and offer SMEs rebates of up to 25 per cent on the new levy from July to the year’s end.
Promotions and discounts will help to draw more Nets users. -
TODAY/fa

 


Other singapore News
Govt to build 10 more family centres to bring help closer
Singapore warns US on anti-China rhetoric
Costs a worry if employers' CPF rate raised
SMRT extends inquiries deadline to March
S'pore should try to up construction productivity: Khaw
S'pore Customs launches dedicated training school
Singaporeans supportive of climate change actions
40 firefighters tackle fire at Riverside Road factory
MOE introduces new component in lower secondary humanities subjects
9 NMPs formally appointed
Educate public on need for social services: Chan Chun Sing
Police coast guards present patrol boats to Indonesian counterparts
New energy labels for electrical appliances?
Body found under CTE flyover
NIE, Columbia University launch joint master's programme
Man arrested for impersonating cop
Police bust illegal gambling den
43-year-old man jailed for having sex with minor
2 young women found dead at Changi chalet
Chinese national charged for kicking policeman in groin
Fire at Riverside Road factory under control
SICC sacks GM, accuses him of "grave misconduct"

 

 
Affiliate Sites:
 
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise with Us  |  Terms & Conditions