| |
| |
![]() |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
WASHINGTON: The United States is winding down efforts to destroy poppy fields in Afghanistan, the US regional envoy said, blaming the zealous approach for pushing farmers toward the Taliban.
Richard Holbrooke, the special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, said President Barack Obama's administration was making "significant adjustments" from the previous George W. Bush administration in a bid to root out Islamic extremism.
"We are downgrading our efforts to eradicate crops -- spraying -- a policy we think is totally ineffectual," Holbrooke testified before Congress.
He said the money spared would be devoted to stopping trafficking, pursuing drug lords and helping farmers grow other crops.
"Hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars we've spent on crop eradication has not done any damage to the Taliban. On the contrary, it has helped them recruit," Holbrooke said.
"In my experience," the veteran US diplomat and negotiator said, "this is the least effective program ever."
Afghanistan supplies 90 per cent of the world's heroin, much of which emanates from the southern province of Helmand, where Taliban-led insurgents are waging a bloody campaign against international and Afghan forces.
Critics, even within the NATO-led coalition in Afghanistan, have feared that the United States was pushing impoverished peasants to the Taliban by destroying their key cash crop while funding the extremists.
Holbrooke said the Obama administration was instead focusing on ramping up agricultural aid to provide Afghans with alternative livelihoods.
But his view was challenged by Representative Mark Souder, a member of Bush's Republican Party, who said Afghanistan was already "the breadbasket of the world" until poppy became more lucrative.
"There has to be some disincentive to plant heroin in addition to an incentive to plant other crops," Souder said.
"It will not suffice to say 'Plant corn', when you can get incredible amounts more dollars" for poppy, he said.
General Chip Gregson, the assistant secretary of defense for Asia, said the long-term solution was to improve security and infrastructure in Afghanistan to allow more legitimate agriculture.
"Eradication by itself hurts the farmers," Gregson told the hearing. "The people who are making money off the drug trade are not the subsistence farmers -- they are the middlemen."
He cited as a model the success of Thailand in eliminating poppy production in the once infamous "Golden Triangle" bordering Laos and Myanmar.
"The Thailand part of the Golden Triangle is now growing designer coffee that sells for three dollars a cup here in Washington and the farmers get the profits," he said.
The Taliban had clamped down on opium production when it imposed its austere brand of Islam on Afghanistan during its five-year rule, which ended in a US-led military operation after the September 11 attacks.
But opium production has since soared into an industry estimated by some experts to be worth 100 million dollars a year, providing a major source of funding for the Taliban.
Antonio Costa, director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, said eradication of crops had not worked in Afghanistan and it was more effective to go after high-value targets such as laboratories.
Costa, in Washington to present the annual UN report on drugs, said market forces were also helping. He said Afghanistan was producing double the world demand for opium -- sending prices tumbling.
"We want basically conditions where prices are so low that farmers will turn to alternative crops," Costa said.
- AFP/yt
|
