Skip to main content



commentary Commentary

Commentary: China doesn’t need global trade to keep growing

While openness is in China’s interest – and the interest of those it engages – recent trade hostilities have highlighted the Chinese economy’s resilience, say Andrew Sheng from the University of Hong Kong and Xiao Geng of Peking University.

Commentary: China doesn’t need global trade to keep growing

China's economy has been hit by cooling domestic demand and the long-running trade dispute with the United States AFP/STR

HONG KONG: The People’s Republic of China celebrated the 70th anniversary of its founding last month with impressive military and civilian parades meant to showcase the extraordinary progress the country has made under the leadership of the Communist Party of China.

Formidable challenges lie ahead. But China’s record so far, and the resources it has at its disposal, indicate that it may well be up to the task.


China’s achievements are undeniable. In the last 40 years, it realised the fastest-ever sustained expansion by a major economy, enabling more than 850 million people to escape poverty. 

As investment in infrastructure, science and technology, education, and health has expanded, living standards have skyrocketed.

READ: Commentary: A rising China is leaving behind rural villages

But in the third quarter of 2019, China recorded just 6 per cent annual growth, the slowest since March 1992. And prospects for boosting that rate are limited, not least because the world is facing a synchronised slowdown.

In its latest World Economic Outlook, the International Monetary Fund downgraded its 2019 global growth estimate to 3 per cent, the lowest rate since the 2008 crisis.


The outside world is also increasingly rejecting engagement, with the United States leading the way. President Donald Trump’s trade war has left no doubt that the US regards China as a strategic competitor, not a potential partner.

China's economy expanded at its slowest pace for nine years in the third quarter of 2018. (Photo: AFP/Johannes EISELE)

Some in the US now advocate a complete decoupling of the world’s two largest economies, unless China makes fundamental changes to its political system, economy, and foreign policy. China has not been the only victim of US protectionism; Trump has also targeted India, the European Union, and others.

So, beyond direct animosity from the US, China must contend with profound and unpredictable geopolitical and economic shifts, driven partly by a backlash against globalisation – the very process that enabled China’s rise.

Chinese leaders have been working to counter that backlash by highlighting the benefits of international trade and cooperation. They have also reconfirmed their commitment to continued structural reform and opening up.

READ: Commentary: Nothing could slow the great India growth train. Until now

READ: Commentary: Chinese leaders must convince others of China’s peaceful rise

As a recent McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) report showed, China has plenty of room for progress. The country accounts for 11 per cent of global trade in goods, but only 6 per cent of trade in services, underscoring the growth opportunities that a more developed services sector would provide.

While China and the US say they are close to signing off on a mini trade deal next month, there are worries about the chances of them reaching a long-term agreement. (File photo: AFP/Anthony WALLACE)

Moreover, foreign ownership in China’s banking, securities, and bond markets remains below 6 per cent. And while Chinese tourists made 150 million outbound trips in 2018, the country receives only 0.2 per cent of global migrant inflows. 

Increased Chinese engagement with the rest of the world could, MGI estimates, generate US$22 trillion to US$37 trillion of value for the global economy by 2040.

In particular, China would benefit from import growth (US$3 to US$6 trillion), liberalisation of services (US$3 trillion to US$55 trillion), globalisation of financial markets (US$5 trillion to US$8 trillion), collaboration on providing global public goods (US$3 trillion to US$6 trillion), and flows of technology and innovation (US$8 trillion to US$12 trillion).


This is not to say, however, that China needs the world, at least not as desperately as Trump and his advisers seem to believe.

While openness is in China’s interest – and the interest of those with which it engages – recent trade hostilities have highlighted the Chinese economy’s resilience. In fact, given China’s scale, there is enough domestic economic competition to continue driving progress, even without external engagement.

China was a major market for US soybean farmers. (Photo: AFP/STR)

Few economies are large enough to test different development models in parallel, without worrying about systemic shocks. But that is precisely what China is doing.

Commentary: China must make its huge domestic market size a source of growth


China has a long tradition of experimentation and adaptation, with competition among cities, in particular, bringing development breakthroughs.

The central government is now cultivating much larger urban clusters – the Greater Bay Area (covering nine cities around the Pearl River Delta in Guangdong province, plus Hong Kong and Macau), the Yangtze River Delta (centered on Shanghai), and the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei cluster – to serve as platforms for further experimentation and competition.

Add to that significant scope for fiscal and monetary stimulus – thanks partly to a high domestic saving rate – and China’s leaders are more confident than ever that they can resist outside efforts to dictate its policies. 

The West should expect China to adhere to its policy of strategic patience, pursue further efficiency gains, and implement difficult but necessary reforms. Throughout this process, China will continue placing the highest priority on maintaining social and political stability – a prerequisite for long-term economic development.

FILE PHOTO: A long exposure picture of boats passing by a business area along the Pearl River in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, March 22, 2014. REUTERS/Alex Lee/File Photo

As Harvard’s Dani Rodrik recently observed, “Give the state too much of an upper hand over society, and you have despotism. Render the state weak vis-à-vis society, and you get anarchy.” For China, ensuring that greater openness does not bring problems like instability or corruption demands a strong state.

The US-led unipolar global order is disintegrating fast, not because the world wanted that outcome, but because the hegemon did. This is a tragedy. 

But all China – or any country – can do at this point is adapt to the new reality.

For now, that means maintaining internal stability and advancing development, while resisting outside pressure to act against its own interests.

Andrew Sheng is Distinguished Fellow of the Asia Global Institute at the University of Hong Kong and a member of the UNEP Advisory Council on Sustainable Finance. Xiao Geng, President of the Hong Kong Institution for International Finance, is a professor and Director of the Research Institute of Maritime Silk-Road at Peking University HSBC Business School.


Also worth reading