Skip to main content
Best News Website or Mobile Service
 
WAN-IFRA Digital Media Awards Worldwide
Best News Website or Mobile Service
 
Digital Media Awards Worldwide
Hamburger Menu

Advertisement

Advertisement

commentary Commentary

Commentary: China’s pineapple ban another pickle in relations with Taiwan

The ban on Taiwanese pineapples is reminiscent of China’s ban on Philippine bananas in the aftermath of the Scarborough Shoal standoff in April 2012, says Dalton Lin.

Commentary: China’s pineapple ban another pickle in relations with Taiwan

Crates of pineapples are sorted at a warehouse in Pingtung county, Taiwan. (Photo: AFP/Sam Yeh)

ATLANTA, Georgia: Beijing suddenly announced on Feb 26 that it would suspend pineapple imports from Taiwan starting Mar 1, citing pests detected on the pineapples.

The Taiwan pineapple ban is reminiscent of China’s ban on Philippine bananas in the aftermath of the Scarborough Shoal standoff in April 2012, when China similarly cited pests on Philippine fruits to deny their importation.

Taiwan’s partners, including Japan and the United States, quickly took action to show their solidarity with the island.

Unlike the banana ban in 2012, this pineapple ban’s timing appears mysterious because no incident preceded the suspension. Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen called the announcement “ambush-like”.

TRIANGULAR DYNAMICS

The larger background to this ban involves the triangular dynamics between Beijing, Taipei and Washington.

The Biden administration’s statements and actions since its inauguration indicate that it will continue the Trump administration’s strong support of Taiwan. 

READ: Commentary: How China will try to subdue Taiwan – without firing a bullet

The pineapple ban is Beijing’s signal to Taipei that it cannot circumvent the influence of Beijing over its affairs, even with US support.

The ban could also be explained with reference to Taiwan’s pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government having recently reshuffled its Mainland Affairs Council (MAC).

The new MAC head has signalled optimistic expectations in breaking the cross-Strait impasse.

The pineapple ban lays bare the reality of cross-Strait relations when there is no official channel to deal with an issue as minor as “harmful creatures” found on pineapples. 

READ: Commentary: Continued US trade war with China could stoke inflation

Beijing reiterated its political precondition for exchange - that Taipei needs to find a way to come to terms with Beijing’s “one China” principle - and laid the blame for disrupted cross-Strait relations on the DPP government.

The ban might just be another attempt to squeeze Taiwan, the newest measure in a long process that kicked off in 2016.

While much of Taiwan's pineapple crop is consumed at home, 90 per cent of its overseas shipments head for sale in the vast Chinese market. (Photo: AFP/Sam Yeh)

China has thwarted Taiwan’s international participation, most noticeably in the World Health Organization (WHO) during the pandemic. 

The Chinese military has increased its vessels in areas around Taiwan, most recently intruding into Taiwan’s southwest air defence identification zone. 

Economically, China has cut tourists to Taiwan and suspended its contract production with the island. The pineapple ban falls under this last category of measures.

APPLYING CORE PRESSURE

Beijing’s aim is not to economically sanction Taiwan as a whole but to target sanctions against the DPP’s core constituencies.

These include the so-called “three middles and one youth” who tend to be more sympathetic to the DPP: Middle-to-small businesses, middle-to-southern Taiwan, middle-to-low-income people, and Taiwan’s youth.

READ: Commentary: China’s foreign loans, as a recent study shows, is full of ‘Chinese characteristics’

The pineapple farmers fall into the overlap of several of these categories. It has been rumoured that China’s next sanction target might be wax apples, predominantly grown in southern Taiwan.

Since the ban, Taipei has tried to highlight what it perceives as Beijing’s coercion and has sought to garner international support by launching a #FreedomPineapples campaign. The slogan mimics the #FreedomWine tagline supporting Australian wines sanctioned by China.

China is the biggest market for Australian wine, importing a record $900 million worth in 2019 AFP/NOEL CELIS

Australia and Taiwan’s cases are similar because China denied access to its massive market as a tool of economic coercion to signal its displeasure with Canberra’s and Taipei’s political behaviour.

Both instances also show China’s preference for grey-zone trade coercion by cutting off market access on regulatory grounds. This form of coercion allows China to deny it is using economic sanctions.

ONE CHINA POLICY

The cases of Australia and Taiwan also differ in significant ways. China’s dispute with Taiwan is fundamentally about Taiwan’s status — the “one China” issue — which China does not expect to find a solution to in the short term.

READ: Commentary: Don't be too quick to dismiss the economic benefits of RCEP for Southeast Asia

China’s disputes with Australia are about Canberra’s policies, including the banning of Huawei in Australia’s 5G construction and calling for an independent investigation into China’s handling of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Policy issues between China and Australia will shift continually. Beijing has targeted some of Australia’s largest exports to China to deter Canberra from encroaching on China’s interests in the future.

Taiwan Strait. (Photo: AP) China Taiwan US

Beijing has not targeted Taiwan’s top exports to China. Taiwan’s pineapples rely primarily on the domestic market, with exports to China only accounting for 9 per cent of sales. China also hopes to win Taiwan’s hearts and minds.

Following the pineapple ban, Beijing announced a package of 22 new incentive measures, including offering land and financial support to encourage Taiwan’s agricultural businesses to invest in China.

If China presses too hard on Taiwan’s status, there is a genuine risk that economic coercion could transition into armed conflict. Taipei may show its defiance by moving towards independence and this might force Beijing’s hand.

READ: Commentary: The broader dialogue the US-China relationship needs

READ: Commentary: The Quad has a plan and it’s not all about China

China has avoided putting all-out economic pressure on Taiwan to allow both sides an opportunity to maintain peace, despite an increasingly tense relationship.

The pineapple ban might not actually be pre-meditated and China’s phytosanitary concerns could be real.

But by choosing not to talk to Taipei to resolve the issue, Beijing’s message has been delivered: Taiwan cannot circumvent China and, without a common political understanding, breaking the cross-Strait impasse will remain wishful thinking.

Dalton Lin is Assistant Professor at the Sam Nunn School of International Affairs, Georgia Institute of Technology, and the Executive Editor of Taiwan Security Research. This commentary first appeared on East Asia Forum. Read it here.

Source: CNA/ml

Advertisement

Also worth reading

Advertisement