Commentary: China beats the US in post-crisis recovery – again
In both the 2008 global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, China’s crisis response was far more effective than that of the US, says Stephen S Roach.
NEW HAVEN, Connecticut: Just as China led the world in economic recovery in the aftermath of the global financial crisis of 2008, it is playing a similar role today. Its post-COVID rebound is gathering momentum amid a developed world that remains on shaky ground.
Unfortunately, this is a bitter pill for many to swallow – especially in the United States, where demonisation of China has reached epic proportions.
The two crises are, of course, different. Wall Street was ground zero for the 2008 crisis, while the COVID-19 pandemic was spawned in the wet markets of Wuhan.
But in both cases, China’s crisis-response strategy was far more effective than that deployed by the US. In the five years following the onset of the 2008 crisis, annual real GDP growth in China averaged 8.6 per cent on a purchasing power parity basis.
While that was slower than the blistering and unsustainable 11.6 per cent average pace of the five previous years, it was four times the US economy’s anemic 2.1 per cent average annual growth over the post-crisis 2010 to 2014 period.
READ: Commentary: Politics used to create the stability needed for business growth. That has now changed
CHINA’S RAPID RETURN TO PRE-COVID TRENDS
China’s pandemic response hints at a comparable outcome in the years ahead. The GDP report for the third quarter of 2020 suggests a rapid return to the pre-COVID trend.
The 4.9 per cent year-on-year figure for real GDP growth does not convey a full sense of the self-sustaining recovery that is now emerging in China.
Measuring economic growth on a sequential quarterly basis and converting those comparisons to annual rates – the preferred construct of US statisticians and policymakers – provides a much cleaner sense of real-time shifts in the underlying momentum of any economy.
On that basis, China’s real GDP rose at an 11 per cent sequential annual rate in the third quarter, following a 55 per cent post-lockdown surge in the second quarter.
The comparison with the US is noteworthy. Both economies experienced comparable contractions during their respective lockdowns, which came one quarter later for the US. China’s 33.8 per cent sequential annualised plunge in the first quarter was almost identical to the 31.2 per cent US contraction in the second quarter.
Based on incoming high-frequency monthly data, the so-called GDPNow estimate of the Atlanta Federal Reserve puts third-quarter sequential real GDP growth in the US at around 35 per cent.
While that is a welcome and marked turnaround from the record decline during the lockdown, it is about 20 percentage points short of China’s post-lockdown rebound and still leaves the US economy about 3 per cent below its peak of late 2019.
AFTER THE SNAPBACK
Post-lockdown rebounds are not the real story, however. They are akin to the snapback of a stretched rubber band – or in statistical terms, the arithmetical result of restarting an economy that has just been subjected to an unprecedented sudden stop.
The true test comes after the snapback, and that’s where China’s strategy has its greatest advantage.
China’s response to COVID-19 borrowed a page from its playbook in 2008, when it ring-fenced its financial markets from the toxic fallout of the subprime crisis.
The objective back then was crystal clear from the start: address the source of the shock, itself, rather than the collateral damage the shock caused.
The 4 trillion yuan (US$596.4 billion) fiscal stimulus of 2008 to 2009 worked only because China had taken strong actions to insulate its markets from a virulent financial contagion.
China’s approach today is similar: First, insulate its citizens from a virulent pathogenic contagion with public health measures aimed at containing and mitigating the spread of the disease, and then – and only then – make judicious use of monetary and fiscal policy to reinforce the post-lockdown snapback.
This is very different from the approach taken in the US, where the post-lockdown debate is more about using monetary and fiscal policies as front-line instruments of economic liberation, rather than relying on disciplined public-health measures aimed at virus containment.
COVID-FIRST VS AMERICA-FIRST
This underscores the sharp contrast between China’s COVID-first strategy and the America-first approach of US President Donald Trump’s administration. In China, unlike the US, there is no political and public resistance to masks, social distancing, and aggressive testing as requisite norms of the COVID-19 era.
Meanwhile, the US is in the midst of its third serious wave of infection while China continues to exercise prompt and effective control over new outbreaks.
Earlier this autumn, for example, some 9 million citizens in Qingdao were tested in just five days after a relatively small outbreak affecting fewer than 20 residents.
By contrast, Trump wears his own experience with COVID-19 infection as some perverse badge of courage, rather than as a warning of what may lie ahead.
In this context, China’s impressive GDP results in the third quarter stand in even sharper contrast with the precarious post-lockdown state of the US economy.
Ongoing distress in the US labour market – unemployment insurance claims remained above 800,000 on a four-week moving average through mid-October, and the 7.9 per cent national unemployment rate in September was still more than double its pre-pandemic 3.5 per cent level – leaves America’s consumer-led economy highly vulnerable to a setback.
The confluence of a new COVID-19 wave with the on-again, off-again political debate over another fiscal relief package has effectively neutralised the animal spirits that have long powered economic recovery in the US.
While China’s 11.2 per cent sequential annualised growth in the third quarter of this year builds effectively on its post-lockdown snapback, some lingering signs of weakness are evident in several key segments of consumer services – namely travel, leisure, and entertainment.
Human nature is the same everywhere, with fear and caution enduring, even in countries where aggressive containment measures are working.
For those unwilling to focus on containment, like the US, the long shadow of COVID-19 speaks volumes to the ever-present perils of a double-dip recession.
That is exactly what has happened in the aftermath of eight of the last 11 US recessions. The contrast with China’s self-sustaining recovery couldn’t be more striking.
Stephen S Roach is a faculty member at Yale University and the author of Unbalanced: The Codependency of America and China.