Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

commentary Commentary

Commentary: The likelihood of stagflation just got higher

A K-shaped recovery is underway. Those with stable jobs will fare well, but those unemployed or working blue-collar and service jobs won’t, says Nouriel Roubini.

Commentary: The likelihood of stagflation just got higher

People wait in line at the St Clements Food Pantry for food during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Manhattan borough of New York City, on Dec 11, 2020. (Photo: REUTERS/Carlo Allegri)

NEW YORK CITY: The US economy’s K-shaped recovery is underway. Those with stable full-time jobs, benefits and a financial cushion are faring well as stock markets climb to new highs.

Those who are unemployed or partially employed in low-value-added blue-collar and service jobs – the new “precariat” – are saddled with debt, have little financial wealth, and face diminishing economic prospects.

These trends indicate a growing disconnect between Wall Street and Main Street. The new stock market highs mean nothing to most people.

READ: Commentary: Why investors who are ‘buying the dip’ are taking a big risk

The bottom 50 per cent of the wealth distribution holds just 0.7 per cent of total equity-market assets, whereas the top 10 per cent commands 87.2 per cent, and the top 1 per cent holds 51.8 per cent.

The 50 richest people have as much wealth as the 165 million people at the bottom.

Rising inequality has followed the ascent of Big Tech. As many as three retail jobs are lost for every job that Amazon creates, and similar dynamics hold true in other sectors dominated by tech giants.

READ: Commentary: Has Razer found a new way to reach profitability?

MILLENNIALS DUPED AGAIN

But today’s social and economic stresses are not new. For decades, strapped workers have not been able to keep up with the Joneses, owing to the stagnation of real (inflation-adjusted) median income alongside rising costs of living and spending expectations.

For decades, the “solution” to this problem was to “democratise” finance so that poor and struggling households could borrow more to buy homes they couldn’t afford, and then use those homes as ATM machines.

This expansion of consumer credit – mortgages and other debt – resulted in a bubble that ended with the 2008 financial crisis, when millions lost their jobs, homes, and savings.

A courier for food delivery service Deliveroo rides a bike in central Brussels on Jan 16, 2020. (File photo: Reuters/Yves Herman)

Now, the same millennials who were shafted over a decade ago are being duped again. Workers who rely on gig, part-time, or freelance “employment” are being offered a new rope with which to hang themselves in the name of “financial democratisation”.

Millions have opened accounts on Robinhood and other investment apps, where they can leverage their scant savings and incomes several times over to speculate on worthless stocks.

The recent GameStop narrative, featuring a united front of heroic small day traders fighting evil short-selling hedge funds, masks the ugly reality that a cohort of hopeless, jobless, skill-less, debt-burdened individuals is being exploited once again.

READ: Commentary: GameStop insanity has painful lessons on short-selling and more for retail investors

Many have been convinced that financial success lies not in good jobs, hard work, and patient saving and investment, but in get-rich-quick-schemes and wagers on inherently worthless assets like cryptocurrencies.

Make no mistake: The populist meme in which an army of millennial Davids takes down a Wall Street Goliath is merely serving another scheme to fleece clueless amateur investors. As in 2008, the inevitable result will be another asset bubble.

The difference is that this time, recklessly populist members of Congress have taken to inveighing against financial intermediaries for not permitting the vulnerable to leverage themselves even more.

(If none of what happened with GameStop made sense to you, listen to financial veterans break down how different players powered the surge and which listed company could see copycat attacks in CNA's Heart of the Matter podcast:)

 

MARKETS STARTING TO WORRY

Making matters worse, markets are starting to worry about the massive experiment in budget-deficit monetisation being carried out by the US Federal Reserve and Department of the Treasury through quantitative easing (a form of Modern Monetary Theory or “helicopter money”).

A growing chorus of critics warns that this approach could overheat the economy, forcing the Fed to hike interest rates sooner than expected. Nominal and real bond yields are already rising, and this has shaken risky assets like equities.

Owing to these concerns about a Fed-led taper tantrum, a recovery that was supposed to be good for markets is now giving way to a market correction.

READ: Commentary: Companies and workers, forget life before COVID-19. Budget 2021 will help us prepare for life after it

Meanwhile, congressional Democrats are moving ahead with a US$1.9 trillion rescue package that will include additional direct support to households.

But with millions already in arrears on rent and utilities payments or in moratoria on their mortgages, credit cards, and other loans, a significant share of these disbursements will go toward debt repayment and saving, with only around one-third of the stimulus likely to be translated into actual spending.

This implies that the package’s effects on growth, inflation, and bond yields will be smaller than expected.

And because the additional savings will end up being funneled back into purchases of government bonds, what was meant to be a bailout for strapped households will in effect become a bailout for banks and other lenders.

Financial Markets Wall Street

To be sure, inflation may eventually still emerge if the effects of monetised fiscal deficits combine with negative supply shocks to produce stagflation.

The risk of such shocks has risen as a result of the new Sino-American cold war, which threatens to trigger a process of deglobalisation and economic balkanisation as countries pursue renewed protectionism and the re-shoring of investments and manufacturing operations.

But this is a story for the medium term, not for 2021.

READ: Commentary: Is higher inflation just around the corner?

MARKET MANIA IS CAUSE FOR CONCERN

When it comes to this year, growth may yet fall short of expectations. New strains of the coronavirus continue to emerge, raising concerns that existing vaccines may no longer be sufficient to end the pandemic.

Repeated stop-go cycles undermine confidence, and political pressure to reopen the economy before the virus is contained will continue to build. Many small- and medium-size enterprises are still at risk of going bust, and far too many people are facing the prospects of long-term unemployment.

FILE PHOTO: Hundreds of people line up outside a Kentucky Career Center hoping to find assistance with their unemployment claim in Frankfort, Kentucky, U.S. June 18, 2020. REUTERS/Bryan Woolston/File Photo

The list of pathologies afflicting the economy is long and includes rising inequality, deleveraging by debt-burdened firms and workers, and political and geopolitical risks.

Asset markets remain frothy – if not outright bubbly – because they are being fed by super-accommodative monetary policies. But today’s price/earnings ratios are as high they were in the bubbles preceding the busts of 1929 and 2000.

Between ever-rising leverage and the potential for bubbles in special-purpose acquisition companies, tech stocks, and cryptocurrencies, today’s market mania offers plenty of cause for concern.

Under these conditions, the US Fed is probably worried that markets will instantly crash if it takes away the punch bowl.

And with the increase in public and private debt preventing the eventual monetary normalisation, the likelihood of stagflation in the medium term – and a hard landing for asset markets and economies – continues to increase.

Nouriel Roubini, CEO of Roubini Macro Associates and host of the NourielToday.com broadcast, is Professor of Economics at New York University’s Stern School of Business.

Advertisement

Also worth reading

Advertisement