Skip to main content



commentary Commentary

Commentary: The finance sector is already moving away from fossil-fuel investments

A monumental shift towards renewables is already underway, says Andrew Higham.

Commentary: The finance sector is already moving away from fossil-fuel investments

The 4.9 MW solar project, built by Cypress Creek Renewables, is pictured in Newton, North Carolina, United States in this undated handout photo on Mar 28, 2017. (Photo: Cypress Creek Renewables/REUTERS)

OXFORD: Some of the most influential players in the global economy are spearheading the shift toward a clean, green, emissions-free world, even while key governments stand idle. 

Financial giants from Europe, China, Japan, the United States, Australia, and elsewhere can see the looming risks and rewards, and they are not waiting on policymakers to signal what needs to be done.

By setting immediate bans on new fossil-fuel investments, labelling clean and dirty energy producers, and dumping unappealing stocks, the financial industry is redirecting huge flows of money from fossil fuels to low-carbon technology.


Such decisions can ripple across economies. Consider, for example, the split between state and private energy finance in India.

 According to the Delhi-based Centre for Financial Accountability, primary finance for coal-fired power plants dropped by 93 per cent between 2017 and 2018, while finance for renewables rose by 10 per cent.

Among the loans for coal projects in 2018, most came from government-controlled financial institutions, whereas three-quarters of renewables financing came from private commercial banks.

Similarly, banks and traders in Japan are abandoning coal projects in favour of renewables, even though the government has resisted setting a phase-out date for coal-powered energy.

READ: Commentary: Climate action is our generation’s 1965

Chimneys are seen through a window at a coal-fired power plant on a hazy day in Shimen county, central China's Hunan Province, Jun 2, 2014. (File photo: Reuters/Jason Lee)

Three Japanese coal-plant projects have been cancelled or delayed this year. And at the global level, the International Energy Agency (IEA) reports that investments in coal-power plants hit a century low in 2018, while more coal generators were retired.


This trend will become more pronounced as the number of financial firms shifting from fossil fuels continues to grow. Consider the headlines since March.

Norway’s sovereign wealth fund has won parliamentary approval to divest US$13 billion from fossil-fuel stocks, as part of the largest fossil-fuel selloff to date.

Japan’s Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, one of the world’s largest banks in terms of assets, ceased financing new coal-fired power projects.

READ: Commentary: Climate change in Singapore and what the future brings

READ: Commentary: As ice caps melt, Singapore a hot spot for sea-level rise

And Chubb became the first major US insurer to announce a ban on coal coverage, while Suncorp became the last Australian insurer to end coverage for new coal-mining and coal-power projects.

Moreover, the London Stock Exchange has recategorised oil and gas stocks as “non-renewable energy” and classified green-energy stocks as “renewable” instead of “alternative.”

The Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation said it would end financing for coal-power plants (once it finishes two final projects in Vietnam),

Meanwhile China's State Development & Investment Corporation has announced plans to stop investing in new coal-fired plants and focus on new energy sources.

The OCBC logo outside one of its branches in Singapore. (File photo: Ngau Kai Yan) People walk under a sign for OCBC Bank in Singapore. (File photo: Ngau Kai Yan)

More broadly, the Investor Agenda for a low-carbon world has attracted 477 signatories, representing around US$34 trillion in assets under management.

These investors are calling on governments not just to limit rising temperatures, but also to meet the Paris climate agreement’s more difficult goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degree Celsius above pre-industrial levels.


Meanwhile, the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis has found that those who ignored climate-change warnings have already taken a financial hit. BlackRock, the world’s largest fund manager, lost around US$90 billion over the last decade, three-quarters of which was due to its holdings in ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, and BP.

And investors in General Electric, including BlackRock, lost a whopping US$193 billion in the three years leading up to 2018, because the company misjudged the pace of the shift to green energy and the collapse in demand for gas turbines and thermal power stations.


Although the shift away from fossil fuels is already monumental, a potential tsunami awaits. Those divesting from fossil fuels are the early adopters who have sensed a change in wind direction and readjusted their sails. But far more needs to be done.

READ: Want to do more to fight climate change? Cut down on driving, buying stuff and eating meat

The concept of a carbon budget is dead simple: figure out how much CO2 humanity can pump into the atmosphere without pushing Earth's surface temperature beyond a dangerous threshold AFP/PATRIK STOLLARZ

Because those firms’ competitors have yet to take any steps toward divestment, trillions of dollars in carbon assets remain on investors’ balance sheets.

Moreover, according to the IEA, while coal investments have fallen, capital spending on oil, gas, and coal nonetheless bounced back in 2018, and investment in energy efficiency and renewables stalled.

Worse, the consultancy Wood Mackenzie finds that the renewables boom has translated into only 2 per cent of global energy demand. As matters stand, coal, oil, and gas could still supply 85 per cent of primary energy by 2040, down only slightly from 90 per cent today.


To complete the transition away from fossil fuels will require drilling down to the core of the global economy. It does not help that financial institutions in China funneled at least US$1 billion in “green” financing to coal-related projects in the first half of this year.

Companies cannot keep producing oil, gas, and internal combustion engines while gradually shifting to cleaner technologies; they need to make a clean break.

Gas flares from an ExxonMobil oil refinery in Singapore on Feb 26, 2019. (File photo: Reuters/Edgar Su)

Moreover, financiers need to look beyond coal and withdraw support for all fossil fuels. Equally important, governments must set an ambitious trajectory for their economies that impels adherence to the 1.5 degrees Celsius limit on warming. 

Our current path will lead to warming of 3 degrees Celsius or more, which would have catastrophic consequences.


The United Nations Climate Action Summit on Sep 23 offers the opportunity for financial institutions and governments to do what is necessary. 

Secretary-General has called for gold-standard leadership, in the form of government and private-sector commitments to slash emissions to net zero, with interim targets every five years.

Guterres’s call to action is echoed by all who have been demonstrating and striking for the same goal. Investors need to rise to the occasion, by structuring portfolios in such a way as to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. (AFP/Fabrice COFFRINI) UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres says the world can't afford more damage to a major source of oxygen and biodiversity AFP/Fabrice COFFRINI​​​​​​​

That means pushing the companies in their portfolios to change, too, or risk being cut off and left behind. But setting long-term aspirations won’t be enough. 

Actionable steps for the coming months and years must accompany the commitments made today, to ensure that progress remains on track, and climate commitments by countries, businesses, cities, and others are recorded. 

The bigger the divestment movement grows, the harder it will be to hide in the shadows, clinging to the past.

Andrew Higham is Chief Executive of Mission 2020 and a visiting fellow of practice at the University of Oxford’s Blavatnik School of Government.


Also worth reading