Skip to main content



commentary Commentary

Commentary: More in the US have given up on finding a job

Forget lower job growth, the number of people in the US who’ve stopped looking for work is much more worrisome, says economist Michael Klein.

Commentary: More in the US have given up on finding a job

FILE PHOTO: Brochures are displayed for job seekers at the Construction Careers Now! hiring event in Denver, Colorado US August 2, 2017. (Photo: REUTERS/Rick Wilking/File Photo)

BOSTON, Massachusetts: US latest jobs report showed a lackluster gain in jobs in May that was worse than economists had predicted.

While the sudden slowdown in jobs growth after many months of strong numbers is worrying and signals a weakening economy, a more long-term concern is the persistently low labour force participation rate that has not recovered in the decade since the onset of the Great Recession.

I’ve been studying labour market issues for over much of my 30 year career as an economist. Let me explain why you should be paying more attention to the participation rate.


Strong employment growth is important because getting a job is one of the best ways to improve a person’s economic standing. For this reason, slowing employment growth and rising unemployment are worrisome.

A job seeker holds a "We're Hiring" card while talking to a representative from Target at a City of Boston Neighborhood Career Fair on May Day in Boston, Massachusetts, US, May 1, 2017. (File Photo: REUTERS/Brian Snyder)

But while the unemployment rate is currently near a 50-year low of 3.6 per cent, that statistic doesn’t tell the full story and can mask a deterioration in the labour market.

The participation rate measures all active workers divided by the working-age population. More importantly, it reflects people’s attachment to the job market – including their economic engagement and also, because a job is such an important part of a person’s identity, their overall well-being.

When people who are unemployed grow too discouraged and stop looking for work, it causes the participation rate to go down. But as a result, the unemployment rate goes down as well because it doesn’t include people who have given up. This makes the picture look better than it is.

READ: Job insecurity and lower wages plague the American worker, a commentary

From about the late 1980s until 2008, the participation rate fluctuated around 66 per cent to 67 per cent. But after the Great Recession, the rate dropped more 3 percentage points over the next seven years and has barely budged since. The latest jobs report shows it’s at 62.8 per cent.

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits fell 58,000 to a seasonally-adjusted 1.508 million for the week ended Jun 13.

The 3 percentage points decline in participation translates to over 6 million people no longer in the labour force.


What’s driving the decline?

Men’s labour force participation has actually been falling for almost six decades. One possible reason for this is the decline in low-skilled jobs, a decline that was quite sharp during the worst periods of the Great Recession. 

READ: The next recession cannot be fixed by higher government spending, a commentary

Even with the improvement of labour market conditions since the depths of the recession, the participation rate has not recovered.

Women’s labour force participation has also been declining, although this is a somewhat more recent phenomenon. Possible reasons include the relative lack of parental leave and child-care policies compared with these other economies, as well as the greater opportunity for part-time work.

(Photo: Unsplash/Dane Deaner)

READ: The myth of the superhero career woman is holding us back, a commentary

There are appropriate concerns about the cyclical headwinds facing the US economy, and the US's May 2019 jobs report does little to offset those worries. 

But policymakers and all Americans should also be concerned about persistent longer-run trends, like the continuing low rate of labour force participation.

Michael W Klein is the William L Clayton Professor of International Economic Affairs at the Fletcher School in Tufts University. This commentary first appeared on The Conversation. Read it here.

Source: CNA/nr(sl)


Also worth reading