Skip to main content



commentary Commentary

Commentary: Would you let Google Maps rename your neighbourhood?

Three neighbourhoods in San Francisco had their moniker changed and residents decried it, Raechel A Portelli at Michigan State University points out.

Commentary: Would you let Google Maps rename your neighbourhood?

In 2018, Google Maps changed the moniker of three San Francisco neighbourhoods – Rincon Hill, South Beach and South Market – to “East Cut”.(Photo: Google maps)

EAST LANSING, Michigan: What if Google tried to rename your neighbourhood?

That happened to some Californians in 2018, when Google Maps changed the moniker of three San Francisco neighbourhoods – Rincon Hill, South Beach and South Market – to “East Cut”.

Given the extensive reach that Google has in the transmission of geographic data, through Google Maps and its geospatial analysis software Google Earth Engine, the name quickly spread and was adopted by other businesses, such as Uber. But residents decried the change. 

“It’s degrading to the reputation of our area,” one told The New York Times.

(Photo: Unsplash/William Hook)

Neighbourhood renaming is nothing new. Name changes occur when historical names no longer fit, during rebranding campaigns and through gentrification – such as when Pigtown, Brooklyn was renamed Wingate. 

The name Pigtown originally referred to a number of pig farms located in the area. In the 2000s, the area was renamed Wingate by developers to lure in new buyers.

There are many reasons why someone might want to change their neighbourhoods name, but what’s driving current name-changing initiatives carried out by big businesses with little or no personal connection to the places they rename? 

As a geographer, I see three main driving forces – all of which can leave longtime locals feeling upset and left out.


Take National Landing, Amazon’s new name for Crystal City, Virginia.

The name was decided upon by Amazon, local economics groups and JBG Smith, a real estate company based in Washington, DC. The name change, revealed in Amazon’s November announcement on its new headquarters, was meant to unite the neighbourhoods in Northern Virginia, Crystal City, Pentagon City and Potomac Yard areas.

READ: How tech giants are taking over top cities around the world, a commentary

However, in a Washington Post article, Arlington County Manager Mark Schwartz suggested that the name change would not be adopted by the local government.

In most cases, it’s not individual companies making these changes. 

A woman walks outside a building in the Pentagon City neighborhood of Arlington, Virginia, that will make up part of the new Amazon "HQ2" headquarters (Photo: AFP/MARK WILSON)

In the case of the East Cut label, it turns out that Community Benefit District Board – made up of residential, commercial and nonprofit representatives from the area – approved the change in 2017, working with Google to come up with the label.


Gentrification of dilapidated urban neighbourhoods is a common driver of renaming.

Research in Philadelphia by sociologist Jackelyn Hwang shows that gentrification not only shifts the demographics of a given area, but leads to divergent definitions of neighbourhoods.

READ: Single women may be driving gentrification in Hong Kong, a commentary

Minority residents were more likely to call a wide area one neighbourhood, named “South Philly.” White residents, by contrast, divided the same area into multiple neighbourhoods, such as “Graduate Hospital,” “G-Ho,” “So-So,” “South Rittenhouse,” “South Square” and “Southwest Center City,” splitting up areas by their socioeconomic characteristics and crime levels.

In such cases, the use of different neighbourhood definitions served to legitimise one’s presence in a community. Neighbourhoods do this by evoking a sense of place for residents, describing a relationship that the place has with someone’s biography, imagination and personal experiences. 

The names create boundaries between those who are perceived to belong to these communities – and those who do not.


Another driver of neighbourhood label change is the real estate market. 

The use of catchy names, like SoHo in Manhattan, evokes images about the type of environment you might find there. Create the right vision for a buyer, and the area might seem more appealing to them.

(Photo: Unsplash/Robin Garnier)

In Detroit, Google is also responsible for renaming neighboUrhoods and even inserting new names, like the Eye. The New York Times has speculated that the real estate market is a likely culprit.

Real estate agents use neighbourhood names in their marketing campaigns. These new labels can get picked up by companies like Google, legitimising the changes through the company’s wide influences. 

In the Detroit case, officials created their own neighbourhood map of Detroit, correcting errors in the Google Map.

In some cases, these types of changes aren’t welcome by neighbourhood residents. For example, in Harlem, the Keller Williams real estate company began marketing the southern region of Harlem as SoHa without the approval of local residents.

This change spurred political action. New York State Senator Brian Benjamin introduced legislation in 2017 banning these types of unsolicited name changes.

While these name changes might seem innocuous, official neighbourhood names are recognised by the US Geological Survey. 

Neighbourhoods are one example of a type of populated place that does not have official federally recognised names. What happens when these official names do not correspond to the names on the map?


Neighbourhoods play a critical role in creating a sense of belonging and camaraderie among neighbours. They are known by their institutions, crime rates and appearance, as well as the characteristics of their population.

Neighbourhood names carry strong cultural and socioeconomic expectations. 

In a 2015 study, people in 12 major US urban areas were shown online ads for used iPhones. They were less likely to respond if the ad mentioned that the seller was a resident of a disadvantaged neighbourhood. That suggests that racial and socioeconomic stigmas related to a neighbourhood were transferred to their residents.

The Detroit skyline is seen from the north side of the city in Detroit, Michigan, December 3, 2013. (Photo: REUTERS/Joshua Lott)

Whether name changes are driven internally by community members or from external pressures from big businesses like Amazon or Google, these changes have impact on the social and spatial patterns of urban cities.

For example, these types of changes can lead to increased property values, pushing out current residents. In Oakland, California, neighbourhood name changes have led to soaring rental prices, as higher-income residents from San Francisco infiltrate the market.

I’ve seen a few successful cases of neighbourhoods getting new names – usually when the renamers work together with the locals to include their opinions and celebrate their history.

For example, Nap Lab, a design collective located in Indianapolis, took on the city’s lack of neighbourhood names. New names like University Heights, West Indy and Poplar Grove came out of detailed analysis of city records and community documents, as well collaboration with local experts and the internet. Their map, first released in 2008, is still sold today.

Raechel Portelli is an Assistant Professor of Geography at Michigan State University. This commentary first appeared on The Conversation. Read it here

Source: CNA/nr(sl)


Also worth reading