Skip to main content



commentary Commentary

Commentary: Hopes for a rapid US economic recovery are an illusion

Mainstream economists, who are predicting a bumper third quarter recovery, pay little attention to structural issues, says Professor James K Galbraith.

Commentary: Hopes for a rapid US economic recovery are an illusion

US President Donald Trump (L) says the economy is bouncing back from the virus lockdowns AFP/Nicholas Kamm

AUSTIN, Texas: As protests roil the United States, the country’s centre-left economists gaze brightly into their crystal balls.

Harvard’s Jason Furman, formerly chair of US President Barack Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, has warned Democrats – eager to defeat President Donald Trump in the November election – that “the best economic data ... in the history of this country” will emerge just before voters head to the polls.

Paul Krugman is likewise predicting a “fast recovery”. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) agrees. The stock market seems equally optimistic, 

The arithmetic behind this thinking is simple. The CBO expects real GDP to shrink by 12 per cent in the second quarter, and by 40 per cent in annual terms. But it forecasts a third quarter rebound of 5.4 per cent – resulting in spectacular annual growth of 23.5 per cent.

That is certainly possible: Already in May, unemployment figures took a favourable turn, and it is looking like the second quarter slump may not be as bad as projected. 

LISTEN: How Singapore businesses and workers can thrive in a post-pandemic new normal

READ: Commentary: US-China trade, once the thorn in bilateral ties, could now be the solution

But, even if the CBO is right on both counts, GDP at election time would be seven percentage points below its first quarter level, and unemployment would be above – possibly far above – 10 per cent.


Let’s assume that the optimists are right about the third quarter. What happens next? Will the economy continue merrily along, with incomes and jobs bouncing back? Or will it stay in depression, requiring a new revolution – or, more precisely, a new New Deal – to save it?

To assess this question, Furman, Krugman and the CBO share a mental model.

They regard the pandemic as an economic shock, like an earthquake or the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It is a disruption to a solid structure, a deviation from normal growth.

To get America moving again, what is mainly needed is confidence, perhaps aided by stimulus. If consumers channel their pent-up demand into new spending, this “shock-stimulus” model dictates, then businesses will revive investment, and soon enough, all will be well once again.

READ: Commentary: Singapore has a New Deal. We call it the Resilience Budget

President Donald Trump is eager to put the coronavirus pandemic behind him as he seeks to resurrect the US economy and win re-election. (PhotoL AFP/POOL)


This is how mainstream centre-left economists and policymakers have thought about recessions and recoveries since at least the 1960s, when President John F Kennedy and his successor, Lyndon B Johnson, pushed through tax cuts.

But it ignores three major changes in the US economy since then: Globalisation, the rise of services in consumption and employment, and the impact of personal and corporate debts.

READ: Commentary: Is Facebook cosying up to US President Donald Trump?

READ: Commentary: The end of the decade – the world is in more debt and it isn’t going away

In the 1960s, the US had a balanced economy that produced goods for both businesses and households, at all levels of technology, with a fairly small and tightly regulated financial sector.

It produced largely for itself, importing mainly commodities.

Today, the US produces for the world, mainly advanced investment goods and services, in sectors such as aerospace, information technology, arms, oilfield services and finance.

And it imports far more consumer goods, such as clothing, electronics, cars and car parts, than it did a half-century ago.

And whereas cars, televisions, and household appliances drove US consumer demand in the 1960s, a much larger share of domestic spending today goes to restaurants, bars, hotels, resorts, gyms, salons, coffee shops, and tattoo parlours, as well as college tuition and doctor’s visits.

Tens of millions of Americans work in these sectors.

Finally, American household spending in the 1960s was powered by rising wages and growing home equity. But wages have been largely stagnant since at least 2000, and spending increases since 2010 were powered by rising personal and corporate debts.

House values are now stagnant at best, and will likely fall in the months ahead.


Mainstream economics pays little attention to such structural questions. Instead, it assumes that business investment responds mostly to the consumer, whose spending is dictated equally by income and desire.

The distinction between “essential” and “superfluous” does not exist. Debt burdens are largely ignored. 

But demand for many US-made capital goods now depends on global conditions.

Orders for new aircraft will not recover while half of all existing planes are grounded. At current prices, the global oil industry is not drilling new wells. 

Even at home, though existing construction projects may be completed, plans for new office towers or retail outlets won’t be launched soon. And as people commute less, cars will last longer, so demand for them - and gasoline - will suffer.

READ: Commentary: So much wrong in US response to George Floyd protests

Faced with radical uncertainty, US consumers will save more and spend less. Even if the government replaces their lost incomes for a time, people know that stimulus is short-term. What they do not know is when the next job offer – or layoff – will come along.

Moreover, people do distinguish between needs and wants. Americans need to eat, but they mostly don’t need to eat out. They don’t need to travel.

Restaurant owners and airlines therefore have two problems: They can’t cover costs while their capacity is limited for public-health reasons, and demand would be down even if the coronavirus disappeared.

Investors have cheered a huge stimulus bill agreed by US lawmakers aimed at supporting the economy during the virus crisis AFP/SAUL LOEB

This explains why many businesses are not re-opening even though they legally can. Others are re-opening, but fear they cannot hold out for long. And the many millions of workers in America’s vast services sector are realising that their jobs are simply not essential. 

Meanwhile, US household debts – rent, mortgage, and utility arrears, as well as interest on education and car loans – have continued to mount.

True, stimulus checks have helped: Defaults have so far been modest, and many landlords have been accommodating.

But as people face long periods with lower incomes, they will continue to hoard funds to ensure that they can repay their fixed debts. 

As if all this were not enough, falling sales- and income-tax revenues are prompting US state and local governments to cut spending, compounding the loss of jobs and incomes.


America’s economic plight is structural.

READ: Commentary: Could Donald Trump not run for re-election?

READ: Commentary: When economies reopen for business but families are reluctant to spend

It is not simply the consequence of Trump’s incompetence or House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s poor political strategy.

It reflects systemic changes over 50 years that have created an economy based on global demand for advanced goods, consumer demand for frills and ever-growing household and business debts.

This economy was in many ways prosperous and it provided jobs and incomes to many millions. Yet it was a house of cards, and COVID-19 has blown it down.

“Reopen America” is therefore an economic and political fantasy.

Incumbent politicians crave a cheery growth rebound, and the depth of the collapse makes possible some attractive short-term numbers.

But taking them seriously will merely set the stage for a new round of disillusion.

As nationwide protests against systemic racism and police brutality show, disillusion is America’s one big growth sector right now.

READ: Commentary: Twitter may have just helped Trump get re-elected

BOOKMARK THIS: Our comprehensive coverage of the coronavirus outbreak and its developments

Download our app or subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest updates on the coronavirus outbreak:

James K. Galbraith, a former executive director of the Joint Economic Committee, is Professor of Government and Chair in Government/Business Relations at the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of Inequality: What Everyone Needs to Know and Welcome to the Poisoned Chalice: The Destruction of Greece and the Future of Europe.


Also worth reading