Commentary: The new Xbox and Playstation are looking very different

Commentary: The new Xbox and Playstation are looking very different

The latest launches from Sony and Microsoft present starkly different visions for the future of video gaming, say observers.

New Content Item
Composite image of Playstation and Xbox logos. (Photo: REUTERS/Issei Kato/File Photo; AFP/KEVORK DJANSEZIAN

BRISBANE: In the latest salvo of an almost two-decade console war between Microsoft and Sony, both Sony’s Playstation 5 and Microsoft’s Xbox Series S/X were launched last week.

With increased spending on videogames due to ongoing quarantine and travel restrictions, the launches have been described as historically significant.

As is typical for a “next-generation” launch, both consoles sport significant boosts to computing power, support 4K graphics and offer faster performance and loading times.

READ: Could PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X be swansong for consoles?

But unlike previous launches, they present starkly different visions for the future of video gaming.

Sony continues to focus on providing exclusive content.

Meanwhile, Microsoft launched its Project xCloud game streaming service in Australia – the most recent step in a wider trend towards embracing a subscription-based business model.

READ: Commentary: Retail isn’t dead – look at snaking queues outside Apple stores


For a long time, new consoles had been primarily marketed around “platform exclusive” titles available only for that console.

Sony and Microsoft have in the past paid millions to developers for exclusivity deals. In 2010, Microsoft paid Rockstar Games US$75,000,000 to stop Grand Theft Auto IV from becoming a Playstation 3 exclusive.

Sony’s recent PS5 launch carries on this tradition. The console is marketed in terms of first-party exclusives, such as those developed by Naughty Dog (Uncharted, The Last of Us) and Sony Computer Entertainment’s Santa Monica Studio (God of War).

Sony has also had great success selling hardware peripherals that make its consoles more attractive, evident in recent quarterly revenues. The PlayStation virtual reality headset sold more than 5 million units worldwide during the last generation.

A man plays a video game with PlayStation VR headset at Tokyo Game Show 2016 in Makuhari
A man plays a video game with Sony's PlayStation VR headset at Tokyo Game Show 2016 in Makuhari, east of Tokyo, Japan, September 15, 2016. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon

In contrast, Microsoft quickly abandoned the Kinect. This motion-sensing device bundled with the Xbox One never won over its audience.


That said, although Sony vastly outsold Microsoft with the PS4 last generation, it seems in 2020 Microsoft has shifted the goalposts of success.

Microsoft’s aim is no longer to sell the most consoles, but to accumulate the most players, irrespective of where they’re playing. The console itself is now almost secondary.

READ: Commentary: COVID-19 is the perfect time to play video games

For instance, Microsoft’s Game Pass subscription service, launched in 2017, provides access to Xbox titles across both Xbox consoles and PC. Game Pass follows a similar model to Netflix, wherein users pay a monthly fee to access a library of content.

And although having a Game Pass membership isn’t mandatory, Microsoft reports 70 per cent of X/S console users do.

On the surface, subscription gaming seems to offer better value for money in terms of access to content, as gamers don’t have to buy the games outright.

But as has been the case with competing television and film streaming services, should subscription gaming become more common, paying for a range of subscriptions may become costly – especially if certain games are exclusive to certain services.

READ: Commentary: Singapore's Sea is world's best performing stock. And it can do better

READ: Commentary: How Tencent became world’s most valuable social media company – and then everything changed


The Game Pass service uses “cloud gaming” technology. Whereas consoles provide the local computing hardware needed to play games, cloud gaming involves streaming games over the internet, from a host’s remote servers to the user’s device.

In the past, this hasn’t worked well due to “high latency”. This refers to the delay between making an input (such as shooting a character) and seeing the result (the character being shot).

Video game
(Photo: Unsplash/

However, with improved computing power, internet speeds and clever design tricks, cloud gaming is becoming a crowded market, with big tech companies including Google and Amazon joining in, too.

Sony began experimenting with cloud gaming in 2014 with PS Now. This service allows the streaming of older titles, such as PS3 games.

And while Sony continues to offer PS Now for the PS5, and at a cheaper price point than Microsoft’s Game Pass, the PS Now is still focused on old games.

On the other hand, Microsoft is aggressively pushing its new Project xCloud. This service, which comes bundled with the GamePass, allows users to stream certain newer Xbox games directly to their smartphone or tablet, without even needing to own an Xbox console.

Clearly, Micosoft’s focus is on players, not consoles. Considering the massive impact smartphones are having on who plays games (and how often), Microsoft may be setting itself up to engage a much larger audience than ever before.

READ: Commentary: Apple is ahead of the curve with iPhone 12. That may be a problem

LISTEN: iPhone 12 and Apple’s thinking behind advanced features


The 2020 console war looks quite different to those of the past, when a single winner often took it all (or at least the majority of it).

Think Nintendo in 1990s North America, or Sony’s domination last generation with the PS4.

In light of Microsoft’s shifting approach, we’re now in a situation where two winners will likely take large chunks of different markets, by doing different things.

On one hand, this might help diversify the market and provide greater variety for consumers. On the other, Sony and Microsoft’s divergence might have gamers spending more than ever.

Ben Egliston is Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology.Marcus Carter is Senior Lecturer in Digital Cultures at the University of Sydney. This commentary first appeared on The Conversation.

Source: CNA/el