Commentary: Our world is getting hotter, faster

Commentary: Our world is getting hotter, faster

With a clearer picture of temperature variations over the past 2,000 years, we now have a better understanding of the extraordinary nature of recent warming, says University of Melbourne’s Ben Henley.

Hot weather, sun in Singapore - file photo
Clothes drying in the sun during a spell of hot weather in Singapore. (File photo: Gaya Chandramohan)

MELBOURNE: New reconstructions of Earth’s temperature over the past 2,000 years, published this month in Nature Geoscience, highlight the astonishing rate of the recent widespread warming of our planet.

We also now have a clearer picture of decade-to-decade temperature variations, and what drove those fluctuations before the industrial revolution took hold.

Contrary to previous theories that pre-industrial temperature changes in the last 2,000 years were due to variations in the sun, our research found volcanoes were largely responsible. However, these effects are now dwarfed by modern, human-driven climate change.

READING THE TREE RINGS

Without networks of thermometers, ocean buoys and satellites to record temperature, we need other methods to reconstruct past climates. Luckily, nature has written the answers down for us. We just have to learn how to read them.

The Marshall Islands, a low-lying Pacific archipelago, will drown beneath rising seas if global
The Marshall Islands, a low-lying Pacific archipelago, will drown beneath rising seas if global warming continues unabated. (Photo: AFP/GIFF JOHNSON)

Corals, ice cores, tree rings, lake sediments, and ocean sediment cores provide a wealth of information about past conditions – this is called “proxy” data – and can be brought together to tell us about the global climate in the past.

Teams of scientists around the world have spent many thousands of hours of field and laboratory work to collect and analyse samples, and ultimately publish and make available their data so other scientists can undertake further analysis.

READ: Extreme weather doesn't change the minds of climate change doubters, a commentary

Previously, our team, along with many other proxy experts, meticulously analysed and collated temperature-sensitive proxy data covering the last 2,000 years from around the world, creating the largest database of temperature-sensitive proxy data yet assembled. We then made all of the data publicly available in one place.

ASTONISHING CONSISTENCY IN RESULTS ACROSS MANY METHODS

With this unique dataset in hand, our team set about reconstructing past global temperature.

We scientists are notoriously sceptical of our own analysis. But what makes us more confident about our findings is when different methods applied to the same data yield the same result.

An aerial view fishing boats on the shore of the Lake Malawi at Senga Bay. The World Bank ranks
An aerial view fishing boats on the shore of the Lake Malawi at Senga Bay. The World Bank ranks Malawi among the top 10 at-risk countries in Africa to climate change. (Photo: AFP/GIANLUIGI GUERCIA)

In this paper we applied seven different methods to reconstruct global temperature from our proxy network. We were astounded to find that the methods all gave remarkably similar results for multidecadal fluctuations – a very precise result considering the breadth of the methods used.

This gave us the confidence to delve further into what drove global temperature fluctuations on decadal timescales before the Industrial Revolution really took hold.

READ: Why Singapore is heating up twice as fast as the rest of the world

BEFORE HUMAN-INDUCED CLIMATE CHANGE

Our study produces the clearest picture yet of Earth’s average temperature over the past two millennia. 

We also found that climate models performed very well in comparison, and they succeed in capturing the amount of natural variability in the climate system - the natural ups and downs in temperature from year-to-year and decade-to-decade.

Using climate models and reconstructions of external climate forcing, such as from volcanic eruptions and solar variability, we deduced that before the Industrial Revolution, global temperature fluctuations from decade to decade in the past 2,000 years were mainly controlled by aerosol forcing from major volcanic eruptions, not variations in the sun’s output. 

Volcanic aerosols have a temporary cooling effect on the global climate. Following these temporary cooling periods our reconstructions show there is an increased probability of a temporary warming period due to the recovery from volcanic cooling.

Earlier this year One Nation leader Pauline Hanson suggested that volcanic eruptions may be responsible for the recent rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.

A volcanic ash cloud from Mount Sinabung hovers over Karo, North Sumatra
A volcanic ash cloud from Mount Sinabung hovers over Karo, North Sumatra, Indonesia June 9, 2019, in this still image taken from a from social media video. (Photo: Reuters/Sinarisa Sitepu)

RECENT WARMING HAS GONE FAR BEYOND NATURAL VARIABILITY

There are, of course, natural changes in Earth’s temperature from decade to decade, from century to century, and also on much longer timescales. With our new reconstructions were also able to quantify the rate of warming and cooling over the past 2,000 years. 

Comparing our reconstructions to recent worldwide instrumental data, we found that at no time in the last 2,000 years has the rate of warming been so high.

In statistical terms, rates of warming during all 51-year periods from the 1950s onwards exceed the 99th percentile of reconstructed pre-industrial 51 yr trends. 

If we look at timescales longer than 20 years, the probability that the largest warming trend occurred after 1850 greatly exceeds the values expected from chance alone. And, for trend lengths over 50 years, that probability swiftly approaches 100 per cent. 

So what do all these stats mean? The strength of the recent warming is extraordinary. It is yet more evidence of human-induced warming of the planet.

READ: As time runs out on the climate crisis, Singapore prepares to address the cost of adapting, a commentary

WHY HASN’T THERE BEEN NATURAL CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE PAST?

Our understanding of past temperature variations of the Earth contributes to understanding such fundamental things as how life evolved, where our species came from, how our planet works and, now that humans have fundamentally altered it, how modern climate change will unfold.

We know that over millions of years, the movement of tectonic plates and interactions between the solid earth, the atmosphere and the ocean, have a slow effect on global temperature. 

The world's leading authority on climate change has said that in order to stay within a safer
The world's leading authority on climate change has said that in order to stay within a safer cap of 1.5C of warming, drastic cuts in fossil fuel use would be needed within just a few years. (Photo: AFP/INA FASSBENDER)

On shorter (but still very long) timescales of tens to hundreds of thousands of years, our planet’s climate is gradually influenced by small variations in the geometry of the Earth and the Sun, for example, small wobbles and variations in the Earth’s tilt and orbit.

From the Last Glacial Maximum, about 26,000 years ago, when huge ice sheets covered large parts of the Northern Hemisphere landmass, Earth transitioned to a 12,000-year warm period, called the Holocene.

This was a time of relative stability in global temperature, apart from the temporary cooling effect of the odd volcano. 

With the development of human agriculture, our prosperity and population grew. Before the Industrial Revolution, Earth had not seen carbon dioxide concentrations above current levels for at least 2 million years.

READ: Singapore’s climate change fight must be clear about these facts, a commentary

Following the industrial revolution, warming commenced due to human activity. With a clearer picture of temperature variations over the past two millennia we now have a better understanding of the extraordinary nature of recent warming.

It is up to all of us to decide whether this is the kind of experiment we want to run on our planet.

Ben Henley is Research Fellow in Climate and Water Resources at the University of Melbourne. This commentary first appeared in The Conversation.


Source: CNA/sl

Bookmark