Commentary: US presidential election will be closer than polls suggest

Commentary: US presidential election will be closer than polls suggest

Polls substantially underestimated Trump’s support in the 2016 election, says an observer.

Biden Trump composite
Donald Trump and Joe Biden. (Photos: AFP)

SYDNEY: With less than two months until the US presidential election, Democratic nominee Joe Biden leads incumbent Donald Trump in the bulk of opinion polls.

But poll-based election forecasts have proved problematic before. The polls were widely maligned after the 2016 election because Trump won the election when the majority of the polling said he would not.

What went wrong with the polls in 2016? And is polling to be believed this time around, or like in 2016, are the polls substantially underestimating Trump’s support?

READ: Commentary: Trump will get beaten by Biden by millions of votes but plans to win anyway

READ: Biden leads Trump by 12 points nationally among likely voters: Survey

SWING STATES DECIDE US ELECTIONS

US presidential elections are two-stage, state-by-state contests.

States are allocated delegates roughly proportional to their populations, with 538 delegates in total. The votes of Americans then decide who wins the delegates in the Electoral College.

In almost all states, the candidate who has the highest vote total takes all the delegates for that state. The candidate who wins a majority (270 or more) of the Electoral College wins the election.

READ: Commentary: Facebook’s safeguards for the US election are the right move

READ: Commentary: Donald Trump aims to win the US election, one way or another

For the fifth time in American history, the 2016 election produced a mismatch between the national popular vote and the Electoral College outcome. Hillary Clinton, the Democratic candidate, won nearly 2.9 million more votes than Trump, yet still lost the election.

Trump won states efficiently, by razor-thin margins in some cases, converting 46 per cent of all votes cast into 56.5 per cent of the Electoral College. Conversely, Clinton’s huge popular vote tally was concentrated in big states such as California and New York.

Hillary Clinton
Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks in Pasadena, California, on Jan 17, 2020. (Photo: REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni/File Photo)

For this reason, election analysts focus less on national polls and more on polls from “swing states”.

These are states that have swung between the parties in recent presidential elections (for example, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Florida and North Carolina), or could be on the verge of swinging (Arizona, Texas, Georgia and Minnesota).

These states – even as few as two or three of them – will decide the 2020 election.

READ: Portrait of an election: US race boils down to six swing states

STATE POLLS POINT TO BIDEN WIN

As part of a large research project at the United States Studies Centre, we have compiled data from polling averages in all the swing states going back to 120 days before the election and compared them to the same time periods in 2016.

Our research shows Biden currently has poll leads in several states that went for Barack Obama in 2008 and/or 2012 and then swung to Trump in 2016, such as Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. These five states are worth 90 Electoral College votes.

Biden also leads the polls in consistently Republican-voting Arizona (11 electoral votes).

So, if we take recent polls in these states at face value, then Trump would lose 101 of the Electoral College votes he won in 2016 and be soundly defeated.

READ: Commentary: The hope for change in a Biden-Harris US election win

CAN STATE POLLS BE TRUSTED?

But state polls were heavily criticised in 2016 for underestimating Trump’s support.

The final poll averages in 2016 underestimated Trump’s margin over Clinton by more than five points in several swing states: North Carolina (5.3), Iowa (5.7), Minnesota (5.7), Ohio (6.9) and Wisconsin (7.2). This is calculated by taking the difference between the official election result and the average of the polls on election eve.

FILE PHOTO: Voters wait to cast ballots during the presidential primary election in Wisconsin
FILE PHOTO: Voters wait in line outside Riverside University High School to cast ballots during the presidential primary election held amid the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S. April 7, 2020. REUTERS/Daniel Acker/File Photo

A review of 2016 polling by the American Association of Public Opinion Research examined a number of hypotheses about the bias of state-level polls in 2016.

Two predominant factors made the difference.

First, an unusually large number of late-deciders strongly favoured Trump. The number of “undecideds” in 2016 was more than double that in prior elections. Of these, a disproportionate number voted for Trump.

But 2020 polling to date reveals far fewer undecided voters, suggesting this source of poll error will not be as large in this year’s election.

READ: Commentary: A softer Donald Trump could win the US election

READ: Commentary: This may be the most important US election ever

Second, there were changes in voter turnout. In 2016, Trump successfully mobilised white voters who are becoming a smaller portion of the American electorate and ordinarily have low rates of voter turnout. These were largely non-urban voters and those with lower levels of education.

This year will likely see high levels of engagement from both sides – and potentially a surge in turnout unseen in decades – which could further undermine the accuracy of election polls.

REINTERPRETING THE 2020 POLLS

The latest state poll averages imply Biden will handily win the election with an Electoral College victory of 334 to 204.

But if the 2020 polls are as wrong as they were in 2016, then Biden’s current poll leads in New Hampshire, North Carolina and Wisconsin are misleading. If Biden loses these three states, the Electoral College result will be 305-233, still a comfortable Biden win.

us polls 3
(Graphic: United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney)

In recent weeks, however, we have seen Biden’s poll leads in Pennsylvania and Florida be smaller than the corresponding poll error in those states from 2016.

If Trump wins these two large states (in addition to New Hampshire, North Carolina and Wisconsin), and the other 2016 results are replicated elsewhere, then he will narrowly win the election with 282 Electoral College votes.

Given the statistical range of poll errors seen in 2016 – and assuming they reoccur in 2020 – current polling implies Trump has roughly a one in three chance of winning re-election.

READ: Commentary: A better version of America is emerging

OTHER FACTORS IN PLAY

The COVID-19 pandemic and controversies around the administration of the election could further jeopardise the validity of 2020 polling. Official statistics already show many voters are attempting to make use of voting by mail or in-person, early voting.

Access to these alternative forms of voting varies tremendously across the United States, so the political consequences are difficult to anticipate.

Trump and his Republican supporters have raised doubts about the validity and security of vote by mail. A recent opinion poll showed Democrats are much more likely to rely on vote by mail compared to Republicans (72 per cent to 22 per cent).

Unsurprisingly, Democrats and other groups are bringing numerous lawsuits to help ensure vote by mail remains a widely available method of voting.

It is quite likely the courts will be asked to rule on the validity of the results after the election, on the basis mail ballots have been either improperly included or excluded in official tallies.

READ: US vote-by-mail begins as White House campaign gets ugly

FILE PHOTO: Workers empty a carton of ballots from a drop box to prepare them for the mail sorting
FILE PHOTO: Workers empty a carton of ballots from a drop box to prepare them for the mail sorting machine during the presidential primary at King County Elections ballot processing center in Renton, Washington, U.S. March 10, 2020. REUTERS/Lindsey Wasson/File Photo

So, will it be closer than expected?

On the one hand, this year’s election seems to have historically low levels of undecided voters, a factor that should make polls more accurate. But offsetting this is tremendous uncertainty about turnout and whose votes will be cast and counted.

All this suggests considerable caution be exercised in relying on the polls to forecast the election. These forecasts are almost surely overconfident.

The other main takeaway: Trump’s chances of re-election are likely higher than suggested by the polling we have seen to date.

Simon Jackman is CEO of the US Studies Centre, University of Sydney. This commentary first appeared on The Conversation.

Source: CNA/el

Bookmark