Commentary: White House insider resisters are not heroes

Commentary: White House insider resisters are not heroes

The anonymous resisters approach is neither honourable nor effective. They should stand up if they really believe that US President Donald Trump is a threat to the country, says Peter Van Buren.

A new book by White House chronicler Bob Woodward describes US President Donald Trump's staff
A new book by White House chronicler Bob Woodward describes US President Donald Trump's staff as constantly trying to control their unpredictable boss (Photo: AFP/MANDEL NGAN)

WASHINGTON: As a State Department whistleblower who lost his career to tell the truth about the Iraq war, I am burdened by how the interviewees in Bob Woodward’s new book, “Fear,” and the anonymous writer of that New York Times “resistance” Op-Ed are hailed as patriots holding back the US president’s worst impulses through fibs and bureaucratic tricks. 

Having faced similar choices, I know their approach is neither honourable, nor effective.

No one should join the government to do only things they think are personally right; one serves the United States, and takes an oath to a Constitution. There is no addendum saying, “but if you really disagree with the president it’s OK to do what you want.”

This is not to support robotic bureaucrats. But ideas, no matter how vigorously opposed, at some point change from being Trump’s or Barack Obama’s policies to those of the United States. 

Implementing them on a global scale, whether on a battlefield or across a negotiating table, is a team sport. Any other way is to bring on the chaos Anonymous claims to be pushing back against.

BLOWING THE WHISTLE

I served 24 years in such a system, joining the State Department under Ronald Reagan and leaving during the Obama era.  

In the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003, some inside government were privy to information about the non-presence of weapons of mass destruction, and understood President George W Bush was exaggerating or lying about the case for war.

Former US President George W. Bush speaks to health workers during a visit to a clinic in Gaborone
Former US President George W. Bush speaks to health workers during a visit to a clinic in Gaborone, Botswana, April 4, 2017. (Photo: REUTERS/Mike Hutchings)

Three senior officials resigned from the State Department in response. Another State Department official, a former Marine, resigned in protest over the war in Afghanistan. He stated in the New York Times (a signed letter, not an anonymous Op-Ed)

(I) have tried and failed to reconcile my conscience with my ability to represent the current US administration.

More than a decade earlier, four State Department officials quit over the Bosnian conflict, also via public letters of resignation.

Others who believed a president's decisions were harmful to the United States blew the whistle, making public specific evidence at the cost of their jobs and freedom to build an evidence-based case. 

Chelsea Manning spent seven years in prison for leaking classified data, Edward Snowden ended up in exile after informing the public of National Security Agency (NSA) policies threatening Constitutional freedoms. 

For me, I chose to write “We Meant Well” to expose the failed reconstruction efforts in Iraq I once helped lead, and had to end my work as a diplomat in return.

Disagreements over policy are not unique to the Trump administration. Nor are questions of competence. 

Reagan was thought to be senile, George W Bush a dolt. 

But challenges to conscience should be answered by good people who believe enough in the United States to place their lives, fortunes, and honour as collateral toward being listened to, not by working from inside government to surreptitiously ruin policy.

FILE PHOTO: Whistleblower Chelsea Manning talks during the Roskilde Festival 2018 at the Gloria Sta
Whistleblower Chelsea Manning talks during the Roskilde Festival 2018 at the Gloria Stage about activism in Roskilde, Denmark, July 5, 2018. (Photo: Ritzau Scanpix/Torben Christensen via REUTERS/Files)

WE CAN'T ASSUME WHAT INSIDERS ARE DOING IS RIGHT

As for the anonymous claims insiders are disrupting Trump’s excesses without giving any details; we’re to assume whatever they are doing must be better than anything he wants. 

That's not patriotic, it's a disgruntled employee.

There is no evidence that Trump is so incapacitated by either insanity or lack of intellect that he should be removed from office under the 25th Amendment – an option raised in the Anonymous Op-Ed as well as Michael Wolff’s “Fire and Fury” earlier this year. 

White House Chief of Staff John Kelly walks on the South Lawn of the White House as U.S. President
White House Chief of Staff John Kelly walks on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, US, July 23, 2018. (Photo: REUTERS/Carlos Barria)

Until now, the people working for presidents as different as Reagan was from Obama understood, as I did, the only way for America to function credibly was for insiders to work on the nation’s behalf until we couldn’t. 

So let the people inside government who believe America is at mortal risk do something more than gossip to a celebrated journalist. They need to resign, testify, and bring out the documents as proof to separate themselves from partisan operatives. 

Persons of conscience need not be cabinet secretaries. Manning was a private. Snowden a contractor, not even an NSA employee. 

“We never should have heard of them,” said a 1993 story in the Washington Post about those mid-level State Department Bosnia dissenters. 

But they’ve gone and done something extraordinary in Washington: They quit their jobs on moral grounds.

Until any of that happens, we shouldn’t waste another moment on anonymous resisters and unnamed sources.

Peter Van Buren, a 24-year State Department veteran, is the author of We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People and Hooper’s War: A Novel of WWII Japan.

Source: Reuters/nr

Bookmark