REUTERS HEALTH: Women are more likely to develop breast cancer when a mother or sister had this disease, and the risk associated with family history doesn’t appear to diminish with age, a US study suggests.
Family history has long been linked to a higher risk of breast cancer in younger women, who are generally advised to start getting screening mammograms when they are 10 years younger than the age their relative was at diagnosis.
But family history has been thought to be less of a factor for the elderly, and women often stop routine screenings by their 70s.
“Older women with family history have an approximately two-fold higher risk of breast cancer compared to women with no family history,” said lead study author Dejana Braithwaite of the Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington, DC.
“As we go from age-based to risk-based screening recommendations, our findings show that older women with family history may benefit from continued mammography screening, even after age 74,” Braithwaite said by email.
While current US guidelines advise women to get a screening mammogram every other year from age 50 to 74, the US Preventive Services Task Force has not found sufficient evidence yet to weigh in on whether women should continue screening after that.
The goal of mammograms is to detect tumours before they can be felt in a physical breast exam, catching cancer sooner when it is easier to treat. Ideally, this should mean fewer women are diagnosed when tumours are bigger, rapidly growing, and harder to attack.
But widespread screening can also catch small, slow-growing tumours that are unlikely to be fatal. Particularly when women are older or have a limited life expectancy, detection of these less dangerous tumours might result in needless tests and treatment.
But for older women with a family history of breast cancer, the benefits of screening may still outweigh the risks.
Researchers examined data on 403,268 women age 65 or older, including 10,929 who developed breast cancer during an average follow-up period of 6.3 years.
When women ages 65 to 74 had a family history, they were 48 per cent more likely to develop breast cancer, the study found. For women 75 or older with a family history, the increased risk was 44 per cent.
Overall, the elevated risk associated with family history didn’t appear to vary based on the relative’s age when diagnosed with breast cancer.
Among women ages 65 to 74, the risk tied to family history was highest for people with fatty breast tissue. After 75, however, the risk linked to family history was greatest for people with dense breasts.
Unfortunately, the study lacked data on second-degree relatives, such as grandmothers, aunts or nieces, researchers note in JAMA Internal Medicine.
Even so, in the absence of clear screening recommendations for women 75 or older, the results should help elderly women decide if they want to get mammograms, said Natalie Engmann, a researcher at the University of California, San Francisco.
“If they have a family history of breast cancer, and particularly if they also have high breast density, they may remain at elevated risk for breast cancer well into their 70s,” Engmann, who wasn’t involved in the study, said by email.
Thinking about family history might mean more elderly women get screened, said Dr Julie Nangia, director of the Breast Cancer Prevention and High Risk Clinic at the Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas.
“We shouldn’t ignore family history in older patients,” Nangia, who wasn’t involved in the study, said by email.
“Breast cancer is actually more common in women as they age, and some older women who are healthy and have a life expectancy of at least five to seven years perhaps, should be screened and followed more closely with annual mammograms.”