Skip to main content




European football's Messi finances

LONDON : The departure of six-time Ballon d'Or winner Lionel Messi from Barcelona has confirmed what many fans have feared for years - star player wages are now so stratospheric that they risk bankrupting even the grandest clubs.

The charts below show some of the mind-boggling numbers involved in the world's richest leagues, where the financial strains are most acute, and how COVID-19 has compounded the problems.


Barcelona President Joan Laporta said the club was forced to let Messi leave because his wage demands would have jeopardised its future.

He estimated the Argentine's new contract would have meant the club was paying out more on wages than it earns - 110per cent of its revenues to be exact. Without Messi it will be around 95 per cent. "The club is above everything - even above the best player in the world," Laporta said.

A decade ago, wages in the Big Five leagues added up to around €5.6 billion (US$6.6 billion), Deloitte estimates. Wage-to-revenue ratios - the money clubs pay players and other staff - amounted to 51 per cent in Germany, 70 per cent in the Premier League and 75 per cent in Italy's Serie A and France's Ligue 1.

By last season, that combined European wage bill had ballooned to €17 billion.

COVID-19 and empty stadiums though meant the leagues' revenues fell by an average of 11 per cent. It meant wage-to-revenue ratios rose to 73 per cent from 2018-19's 61 per cent in Britain's Premier League, to 67 per cent from 62 per cent in Spain's La Liga, to 78 per cent from 70 per cent in Italy, 56 per cent from 54 per cent in Germany and to 89 per cent from 73 per cent in France.

"UEFA has historically said that a 70per cent wage-to-revenue ratio should be the upper limit for clubs to target, but we may see a number of large clubs go past that figure and possibly even breach 100 per cent in the short term." Sam Boor, a senior manager in Deloitte's sports business group, told Reuters in April.

Even before COVID-19, the wage-to-revenue ratio in England's second tier Championship was already 107 per cent, he said.


The combined value of the top 32 European teams has grown over 50 per cent since 2016, according to accountancy firm KPMG's Football Benchmark team, which looks at clubs' overall 'enterprise value' - their owners’ equity, plus total debt, minus cash.

The rise had been driven - up until last year at least - by an aggregate annual 11 per cent increase in total operating revenues. That has been led by the 65 per cent leap in broadcasting revenues the clubs netted between 2016 and 2020 and respective 22 per cent and 39 per cent rises in average matchday and commercial revenues.

FILE PHOTO: Soccer Football - FC Barcelona Press Conference - Camp Nou, Barcelona, Spain - August 6, 2021 Newspapers are seen displaying front page images of Barcelona's Lionel Messi at a newspaper selling stall outside the Camp Nou before the press conference REUTERS/Albert Gea/File Photo

Olympique Lyon have seen the biggest individual rise over that period at 193 per cent. Tottenham Hotspur have jumped 158 per cent from being worth €800 million to just over €2 billion, while Manchester United and Barcelona have seen 15 per cent and 16 per cent gains to around €3.3 billion and €3.2 billion.



Europe's top 20 clubs generated €8.2 billion in revenue in the 2019/20 season, according to Deloitte's annual football money league report.

That was down from 9.3 billion euros in 2018/19, and although it is partly distorted by the fact COVID-19 led to some broadcast revenues being pushed back into the next accounting year, the pandemic is estimated to have cost those 20 clubs over €2 billion in missed revenue so far.

The figures also show that the dozen clubs in the failed breakaway 'Super League' plan this year earned just over €5.5 billion - 67 per cent - of last year's 8.2 billion total.

In a sub-plot to the Messi saga, both Barcelona and Madrid have been incensed by a proposed €2.7-billion commercial rights deal between La Liga and private equity firm CVC. A consortium including the firm failed with a similar bid in Italy earlier in the year.


Plenty of clubs now have significant debts due to the cost of buying players and building or improving stadiums.

KPMG calculates that England's Tottenham Hotspur, which has just built a new stadium, had the highest overall debt at €685 million as of 2019/20, once things like transfer fees still owed to other clubs are stripped out.

Manchester United and Juventus were next with €524 million and €390 million of debt respectively. Barcelona and Real Madrid had €318 million and €170 million. German champions and Champions League winners Bayern Munich had no debt and clubs like Paris Saint-Germain and Chelsea, on the surface at least, have more cash on their books than interest-bearing loans.

Others argue that those figures do not show the full picture, as some super-wealthy club owners provide interest-free "soft loans" that are not always counted.

Deloitte estimates that Chelsea's debt would be £1.3 billion (US$1.8 billion) and the largest in the Premier League if 'soft loans' from owner Roman Abramovich were included.

The firms also estimate cumulative net debt held by Premier League clubs reached a record of almost £4 billion in 2019/20, up from 3.5 billion in 2018/19 and 2.9 billion in 2017/18.

That debt represented 88 per cent of the Premier League's combined revenues, up from 67 per cent the previous season, although the then record £3.3 billion amount in 2008/09 represented 167 per cent of that season’s revenues.

Source: Reuters


Also worth reading