Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Commentary

Commentary: Where should Afghanistan’s refugees go?

Adoption of hardline policies and anti-refugee sentiments in many countries means that relatively few Afghans will find sanctuary on the continent, says a researcher.

Commentary: Where should Afghanistan’s refugees go?

Refugees from the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan line up to board a US Air Force transport at Kabul airport. (Photo: AFP)

WASHINGTON DC: Images of thousands of Afghans desperately trying to flee their country following a hasty US withdrawal have provoked an international outcry.

As of Aug 22, some 6,000 US troops were working to evacuate US military, American citizens and Afghans approved for Special Immigrant Visas, a programme to protect Afghans who risked their lives working for US troops in Afghanistan.

Germany, France, Italy and the UK are conducting smaller evacuation efforts for their nationals and some Afghans.

The poorly planned evacuations are taking place amid chaos in Kabul, where crowds are being confronted by violence from members of the now-ruling Taliban and US forces and facing checkpoints that are near-impossible to pass.

Shaharzad Akbar, who leads the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, called the situation “failure upon failure”.

This harrowing scene is unfolding within a broader context of Afghanistan’s long-standing displacement crisis. This includes an unequal sharing of refugees between the developed world and economically disadvantaged countries.

A MUTED US ROLE

The US Refugee Act of 1980 standardised the procedures for admitting refugees – people who have fled war, violence, conflict or persecution – and put in place a rigorous vetting process.

But over the past 40 years, US acceptance rates for refugees worldwide have fallen significantly – from 200,000 admitted in 1980 to less than 50,000 in 2019.

Over the past 20 years, the US admitted more than 20,000 Afghan refugees – an average of roughly 1,000 per year.

But during the 2020-2021 fiscal year, just 11,800 refugees from around the world settled in the US – among them were only 495 Afghan Special Immigrant Visa recipients.

That number seems tiny compared to the approximately 20,000 Afghans who are currently in the pipeline waiting for a SIV and the additional 70,000 Afghans — including applicants and their immediate family members — who are eligible to apply.

Afghan refugees who supported Canada's mission in Afghanistan prepare to board buses after arriving in Canada, at Toronto Pearson International Airport on Aug 24, 2021. (Photo: REUTERS)

EUROPE HOSTS FEW REFUGEES

For decades, Afghans have also migrated or fled to Europe. Between 2015 to 2016, 300,000 arrived on the continent. They were the second-largest group of refugees and asylum-seekers after Syrians.

The Afghan population across the European continent remains small and unevenly distributed. Up until the Taliban takeover of Kabul in August 2021, many Afghans were facing deportations. Germany is the largest European host, followed by Austria, France and Sweden.

For the first three months of 2021 about 7,000 Afghans were granted permanent or temporary legal status in the European Union. They are distributed between Greece, France, Germany and Italy, with smaller Afghan contingents in other EU states.

Australia – based on its 2016 census – has approximately 47,000 Afghans who are permanent residents, some of whom began arriving as early as 1979. Approximately another 4,200 Afghans have received temporary protected status.

DISPLACED WITHIN AFGHANISTAN

This still leaves an enormous number of Afghans who are displaced without a permanent home.

More than half a million have already been displaced by the violence so far in 2021 according to the UN refugee agency. Some 80 per cent of nearly a quarter of a million Afghans forced to flee since the end of May are women and children.

As of 2021 and prior to the current crisis, at least 3.5 million Afghans remained uprooted within Afghanistan because of violence, political unrest, poverty, climate crisis and lack of economic opportunity.

AFGHAN REFUGEES IN PAKISTAN

The vast majority of Afghan refugees do not settle in the West.

Pakistan, which shares a 2,640km land border with Afghanistan, has long absorbed the largest number of Afghan refugees even though it is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention or the 1967 Protocol.

Within two years of the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, following the conflict ignited by the rise of the Mujahideen, 1.5 million Afghans had become refugees. By 1986, nearly five million Afghans had fled to Pakistan and Iran.

Since March 2002, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, or UNHCR, had repatriated nearly 3.2 million Afghans, but in April 2021, the United Nations reported that more than 1.4 million Afghan refugees remained in Pakistan due to ongoing violence, unemployment and political turbulence in Afghanistan.

Iran also remains a significant host for Afghans, with nearly 800,000 registered refugees and at least two million more who are unregistered.

Smaller numbers of Afghan refugees and asylum-seekers are in India (15,689), Indonesia (7,692) and Malaysia (2,478).

(Experts say Malaysia may be on its way to a “normal” parliamentary democracy, like Canada, where political coalitions shift and governments change between elections.)

Turkey – the world’s largest refugee host, with over 3.8 million registered Syrian refugees – has 980 registered Afghan refugees and 116,000 Afghan asylum-seekers.

GROWING CONCERNS OVER WHERE AFGHANS WILL RESETTLE

The latest figures from the AP show that more than 47,000 Afghan civilians and at least 66,000 Afghan military and police forces have died in the 20-year-old Afghanistan war

The security situation in the country had been deteriorating in recent years.

According to Brown University’s Cost of War Project, an increasing numbers of Afghans have been killed as a result of crossfire, improvised explosive devices, assassinations by militant groups including the Taliban, night raids by US and NATO forces and US-led airstrikes.

Even prior to the Taliban takeover of Kabul, civilian casualties had risen by 29 per cent in the first quarter of 2021 compared with the same period in 2020. A UN report from July 2021 found a 37 per cent increase in the number of women killed and injured, and a 23 per cent increase in child casualties compared with the first quarter of 2020.

With the Taliban takeover of Kabul, there is a growing concern for the safety of Afghanistan’s women and girls, ethnic minorities, journalists, government workers, educators and human rights activists.

Many Afghans desperate to leave remain outside Kabul and far from any airport.

US evacuations will likely end once all Americans are out of Afghanistan. A few other western countries have committed to taking in small numbers of refugees, including Canada (20,000) and the UK (20,000 over 5 years).

WHERE AFGHAN REFUGEES MIGHT GO

Still, adoption of hardline policies and anti-refugee sentiments across much of Europe means that relatively few Afghans will find sanctuary on the continent.

Austria and Switzerland have already refused to take in large numbers of Afghans. Turkey, already straining with refugees, said it does not want to become “Europe’s refugee warehouse.”

Other countries committing to take in Afghans temporarily in small numbers include Albania, Qatar, Costa Rica, Mexico, Chile, Ecuador and Colombia. Uganda, which already hosts 1.5 million refugees, mainly from South Sudan, has also agreed to take in 2,000 Afghans temporarily.

Strategies for vetting the thousands of Afghan refugees vary from country to country. (Photo: AFP)

Ultimately, most Afghans able to leave the country will do so not in an aircraft, but on foot into Pakistan and Iran.

Pakistan, already strained by its own economic and political struggles, will once again likely be the largest host for the most recently displaced Afghans.

But given that border crossings in the region are difficult and dangerous, the vast majority of uprooted Afghans will remain within Afghanistan’s borders.

Their considerable humanitarian needs, economic and political challenges, security concerns and resistance to the Taliban will shape the next chapter of the country’s history.

Tazreena Sajjad is Senior Professorial Lecturer of Global Governance, Politics and Security, American University School of International Service. This commentary first appeared in The Conversation.

Source: CNA/sl

Advertisement

Also worth reading

Advertisement