Skip to main content
Advertisement
Advertisement

Singapore

Ang Mo Kio corridor murder: Woman gets life sentence for killing boyfriend

The 43-year-old woman plans to appeal against the verdict and sentence.

Ang Mo Kio corridor murder: Woman gets life sentence for killing boyfriend

A view of the Supreme Court in the foreground on Jul 1, 2019. (File photo: Reuters/Edgar Su)

New: You can now listen to articles.

This audio is generated by an AI tool.

SINGAPORE: A Vietnamese woman was sentenced to life imprisonment on Tuesday (Oct 7) for murdering her boyfriend along a corridor of a public housing block in Ang Mo Kio four years ago.

Nguyen Ngoc Giau, 43, was found guilty of the charge on Tuesday, with Justice Dedar Singh Gill saying he was satisfied that the elements of the charge had been established beyond a reasonable doubt.

"I also find that the accused has not succeeded in establishing, on a balance of probabilities, either the defence of intoxication or the defence of sudden fight," he added.

Nguyen had stabbed Mr Cho Wang Keung, 51, along the common corridor on the fifth floor of Block 562, Ang Mo Kio Avenue 3, on Jul 15, 2021.

Mr Cho was a jewellery assembler and landlord who owned a three-room flat at the public housing block.

Nguyen, who is a Singapore permanent resident, moved in as a tenant in July 2020 but began sharing a bedroom with Mr Cho after they became romantically involved.

In July 2021, the couple fell out because Mr Cho wanted to break up with her and evict her.

After drinking beer and making unanswered calls to Mr Cho, Nguyen sharpened a knife and confronted him outside the flat at about 12.50am on Jul 15, 2021.

When she discovered a male tenant taking photos of the assault, Nguyen turned on him and he fled down the stairs, the court heard previously.

The police arrived minutes after that and found the couple in a pool of blood. Mr Cho died later that morning of stab wounds to the neck, chest and back.

Nguyen was assessed to have alcohol-use disorder and likely to be in a state of "acute alcohol intoxication" at the time, a report by the Institute of Mental Health showed.

She was represented by three sets of lawyers under the Legal Assistance Scheme for Capital Offences scheme, namely, Mr Favian Kang from Centurion Law, Mr Kalaithasan Karuppaya from Regent Law and Mr Ng Yuan Siang from Eugene Thuraisingam's eponymous law firm.

At the trial, Nguyen – a petite woman with long hair – testified about her tumultuous relationship with the victim.

She had first come to Singapore in 2010 and met her husband while working in a KTV lounge. They married after two months and have two children together.

She said she last visited her children in 2019 and her last contact with her husband was some time before that.

She said Mr Cho was also married when they began their relationship, and that he grew fond of her after she cared for his daughter, who was more than two years old at the time.

However, she said they drank and quarrelled every day and fought about five times a week.

In the defence's closing submissions, it urged the court to find her guilty of a lesser charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder instead.

It argued that this was "not an egregious case", but that of a couple in an unhealthy relationship, which was "plagued by quarrels and fights".

"Ms Nguyen and the deceased allowed their passions to get the better of themselves due to alcohol," the lawyers said. 

"A misunderstanding was blown out of proportion. They quarrelled and hit each other many times before, but their previous fights did not reach a nasty stage like the present instance, where both sustained multiple serious stab injuries."

The defence also said that Nguyen was so intoxicated that she could not have formed the intention to cause the stab wounds to the victim, or that his death was caused by a sudden fight.

The lawyers argued that Nguyen suffered very serious and life-threatening injuries, raising the possibility that the victim had inflicted them during a violent struggle, which is a foothold to establishing the defence of a sudden fight.

However, the judge rejected the defences put forth by the lawyers and convicted Nguyen.

The prosecution said that it would not be seeking the death penalty for this case and that there was "no issue of caning" given her gender. Under the law, women cannot be caned.

The defence had nothing to add, since the only other possible sentence for the charge was life imprisonment.

Nguyen told the court: "I wish to appeal."

She was convicted of murder under Section 300(c) of the Penal Code, where the act is done with the intention to cause bodily injury to a person and the injury intended is enough to cause death. The maximum penalty is death or life imprisonment with caning. 

Source: CNA/ll/sf
Advertisement

Also worth reading

Advertisement