Skip to main content
Best News Website or Mobile Service
WAN-IFRA Digital Media Awards Worldwide
Best News Website or Mobile Service
Digital Media Awards Worldwide
Hamburger Menu




Alternative ways to distribute COE, fast increasing prices among concerns raised by MPs

Some suggested using a balloting system or a points-based system that takes into account other factors aside from the bidding price. 

Alternative ways to distribute COE, fast increasing prices among concerns raised by MPs

Cars on a road in Singapore. (Photo: TODAY/Leonard Leong)

SINGAPORE: Suggestions on alternative ways to distribute Certificates of Entitlement (COE) and fast-increasing COE prices were among the concerns raised by Members of Parliament on Monday (May 8). 

Following a ministerial statement delivered by Minister for Transport S Iswaran, several MPs rose to offer alternative ways to distribute COEs. 

In his speech earlier on Monday, Mr Iswaran had said that COE premiums are expected to trend upwards, with Singapore’s policy of zero-growth in its car population and as household incomes rise. 

“Fundamentally, the COE prices reflect demand for a limited and falling supply of COEs,” Mr Iswaran said in his statement, responding to more than 20 parliamentary questions filed on the topic. 

Demand for vehicles has remained "resilient", especially as the economy recovers after COVID-19. Incomes have also been rising over the long term, and the ratio of COE price to median monthly household income has fallen, he said. 

“As household incomes continue to rise in the coming years, coupled with our policy of zero-growth in the car population, we must expect the long-term trajectory for COE prices to be upwards,” said the Transport Minister. 


In clarifications after Mr Iswaran’s speech, Mr Liang Eng Hwa (PAP-Bukit Panjang) suggested that “some amount of allocation” by balloting, similar to how Housing Development Board flats are sold, could be piloted. 

Ms Hazel Poa (PSP-NCMP) asked if the Transport Ministry would consider allocating vehicle quotas based on other factors beyond price. 

“For example, maybe a points-based system, where apart from the bidding price, we also consider other factors like nationality and needs-based factors like families with young children or persons with disability,” she added. 

Similar to the implementation of additional buyer stamp duties on those who buy multiple residential properties, Ms Poa also suggested the ministry consider implementing additional levies on multiple vehicle purchases. 

In response to suggestions about different ways to allocate the quotas, Mr Iswaran said that the government would then have to decide how to allocate Ms Poa’s proposed point system, and what would factor into the final COE allocation. 

“Does that mean if someone has got more points and they are entitled to a different price when it comes to the COE? Or does it mean that they go into a different pool? 

“And if they go into a different pool, how do we segment the pools?” he asked. 

If balloting is implemented, the government would also have to decide how to price COE if one segment’s quota is secure, and another segment is based on the luck of the draw, said Mr Iswaran in response to Mr Liang’s question. 

“Do you price it at the same price as the COE in that period? Or do you say no, it’s a discounted price,” he continued, adding that this may prompt those who secured cheaper COEs to resell their cars at a windfall. 

“Then the question is, what justifies such a ballot? Who qualifies and how do we do it?” said Mr Iswaran. 

A balloting system is not a panacea, and may instead aggravate the problems if the concerns are around price and unevenness in the market, he stressed. 

Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh (WP-Aljunied) and Ms Mariam Jaafar (PAP-Sembawang) asked whether the government was looking into curbs on car loans to ensure that loopholes can be tightened. 

“It’s not uncommon to hear of companies … or dealerships offering 100 per cent loans and things of that nature,” said Mr Singh. 

The Monetary Authority of Singapore’s restrictions on loans that are granted by financial institutions are to encourage borrowers to spend or borrow prudently, said Minister of State for Trade and Industry Alvin Tan, standing to respond on the matter. 

In his response to Mr Singh, Mr Iswaran stressed that the objective of the exercise was to control volatility in COE supply, not prices. 

“If every time COE prices go up, we approach it as some kind of new phenomenon, I think we should take pause and understand that these are the fundamentals we are dealing with,” he added. 

The decision to have zero vehicle growth rate is a hard choice, said the Transport Minister. 

“But what is the alternative?” he continued. 

“So I just want to be very clear. It is not about price volatility, although I know that is a political concern. It is about supply volatility and how much we can smoothen that so that the market can function.” 


Expressing concerns about the rate at which COE prices are increasing, Mr Leong Mun Wai (PSP-NCMP) asked if the ministry would consider using the vehicles’ open market value as an additional criterion for classifying cars into Category A for COE premiums - the quota available for smaller cars. 

This is because according to residents, many of the more expensive cars are now entering Category A, he added. 

Responding to Mr Leong, Mr Iswaran said: “Does the member think that lowering of the price is good or bad?” 

Mr Leong replied: “Lowering is good. We would prefer to have a lower price.” 

The Transport Minister then asked if Mr Leong agreed that if vehicle growth is capped at zero, and incomes are rising, rising COE prices would be an “almost unavoidable conclusion”. 

In response, Mr Leong said he agreed with Mr Iswaran on his stand on controlling the car population and using the market the allocate the COE quota. 

“But however, I think the government should also be careful when prices go up too fast. There will be problems. Problems from the aspect of affordability, and also from the aspects of equity,” said the PSP member. 

Mr Iswaran stressed that the government was not stipulating the price or price range of COE premiums. 

“The only thing the government is able to do is settle on the supply, and if there are any mechanics in the system, whether there are reasons to adjust them,” he added. 

“How that flows into the market or works through the market is also dependent on demand … And finally, the price outcome is how the market settles it.” 

He also noted that the median open market value for Category B - the premium for larger cars - is about 75 per cent more than the median for Category A. 

“That means, the market is already quite separated,” said the Transport Minister. 

Responding to Mr Leong’s “political point” about how many Singaporeans cannot afford to buy a car with high COE prices, Mr Iswaran said the subtext of the PSP member’s point was that foreigners are the ones buying the cars. 

“I want you to be upfront about it, because I have taken pains to point out again that the proportion of foreigners buying cars has remained low and stable.” 

When COE prices go up, some people may find it more difficult to afford a car, said Mr Iswaran. 

“There is a reallocation and distribution going on within our society, and that is one of the things, it’s a politically uncomfortable thing but it’s a reality. 

“And I would urge the member to be careful in the way you make this point, because otherwise … we give wrong conclusions and we end up distorting the discussion.” 

Source: CNA/hw(sn)


Also worth reading