Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Commentary

Commentary: UK healthcare system needs fixing and this means shifting away from hospitals

It is easy to blame underfunding or staffing shortages for the National Health Service's long wait times, but what the NHS needs is long-term investment in physical capacity and a shift away from hospital treatment to preventive medicine, says the Financial Times' John Burn-Murdoch.

Commentary: UK healthcare system needs fixing and this means shifting away from hospitals
People line up outside a vaccination centre at the NHS Scotland Leith Community Treatment Centre, in Edinburgh, Scotland. (Jane Barlow/PA Wire/PA via AP)

LONDON: In April this year, 24,000 people were left waiting over 12 hours in England’s emergency departments, the highest this figure has ever been. That same month, roughly 30,000 people who suffered a stroke or sudden chest pain were kept waiting two hours or more for an ambulance (the target is 40 minutes).

These figures might suggest that England’s hospitals are suffering an acute crisis in their own health, one which requires an urgent infusion of money and staff. But that would be a misdiagnosis.

While the pandemic has undoubtedly created a shock in the United Kingdom’s publicly funded health system, the National Health Service’s underlying issues are chronic. Waiting lists for elective treatment have been lengthening for 10 years, and the target of keeping 95 per cent of accident and emergency department waits under 4 hours has been missed for just as long. (These figures from NHS England are broadly replicated in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland: Health service management is devolved.)

ARE UNDERFUNDING AND STAFFING SHORTAGES TO BLAME?

It would be easy to blame underfunding, but in 2019, the UK spent just over 10 per cent of gross domestic product on healthcare, placing it among other wealthy western European countries. The trend over the past two decades has also aligned with comparable nations, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

The next obvious explanation is staffing shortages. After two years which have shone a light on the heroic work done by hospital staff, it seems logical that problems in hospitals should be solved by increasing the number of doctors in wards. But here, again, the picture is nuanced.

While the number of fully qualified permanent General Practitioners in England has fallen by 8 per cent since 2009, that of hospital doctors has grown by a third, outpacing the growth of the elderly population that accounts for an outsized portion of hospital demand. Nurse numbers continue to grow despite more departures this year.

The result is that the UK allocates more of its healthcare spending to hospital services than any of its peers and less to preventive medicine, residential and outpatient care, according to OECD data.

NOT ENOUGH RESOURCES USED FOR PREVENTIVE HEALTH

In other words, ever-growing resources are being used to treat ever more sick people, but ever fewer are being used to prevent them from getting sick in the first place.

This is highlighted by the UK ranking among the highest for rates of hospital admission in the OECD for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – both of which are considered largely treatable within primary care – and by public satisfaction with GPs plummeting from 68 per cent to 38 per cent in 2021.

In the longer term, the focus should be on capital and capacity – beds, diagnostic equipment and IT. This is the biggest yet often least-discussed bottleneck hampering a patient’s flow through the system. If the size of the UK’s healthcare workforce leaves room for improvement, then its record on capital investment is truly the worst in class.

The surge in infections sweeping Britain led to more than 530,000 people being instructed to self-isolate by an NHS app in the week to Jul 7, 2021. (Photo: AFP/Tolga Akmen)

For a full decade, the UK has invested far less in capital infrastructure in healthcare than any other major developed nation, according to analysis by the Health Foundation, resulting in fewer beds and diagnostic scanners than comparable countries.

This picture fits with a report by Monitor, the now-defunct health service regulator. It recorded that while A&E waiting times were not affected by increased staffing levels in the emergency department, they were highly sensitive to bed shortages in the rest of the hospital.

These shortages in turn related to the delayed discharges of elderly patients and the steady increase in bed demand.

None of these headwinds will subside naturally. The huge pandemic-induced backlog means hospitals are now being asked to get through substantially more elective operations than in 2019. The number of people aged 85 and over in England will grow another 25 per cent by the end of this decade. Both factors will increase pressure on beds.

Much like any chronic illness, the NHS’s afflictions will not be cured with sticking plaster. The road to recovery is paved with long-term investment to upgrade the physical capacity of the system and to gradually shift the balance from treatment in hospitals to primary and preventive medicine.

Source: Financial Times/geh

Advertisement

Also worth reading

Advertisement