Commentary: Could Omicron variant be first step towards endemic disease?

BRISBANE, Australia: These are very early days in terms of understanding the Omicron variant. What is known is that it has a large number of mutations, particularly in the spike protein and it appears to be rapidly spreading in specific parts of the world.

Very early indications from Africa suggest it does not cause particularly severe disease, though the World Health Organization has urged caution given the limited data available.

At this point, it isn’t clear whether it has any greater capacity to evade vaccines than other SARS-CoV-2 variants such as Delta.

It is very common for viruses to become less virulent (that is, cause less severe disease) once they become established in a population. The classic example is myxomatosis, which killed 99 per cent of rabbits when first introduced into Australia, but which now causes much lower mortality.

Some experts have predicted COVID-19 will also become less severe as it transitions to an endemic level of disease – settling into a predictable pattern of infections in a given location. It’s possible the Omicron variant may be the first step in this process.

WHY SOME VARIANTS BECOME DOMINANT

Evolutionary biology suggests variants are more likely to thrive if they increase more rapidly in the human population than current strains.

This means two things: Strains with a higher R number - the basic reproduction number, or the average number of people an infectious person will likely infect - will replace those with a lower R number.

Additionally, strains that lead to the host being infectious earlier will replace those that take longer to become infectious. So strains with a shorter incubation period replace those with a longer incubation period. This appears to be the case with the Delta variant, which has a shorter incubation period than the strains before it.

Viral strain evolution needs to be considered in the particular population in which the variant appears. Disease evolution is expected to work differently in a population with low levels of vaccination compared to one with higher levels of vaccination.

In a largely unvaccinated population, like South Africa where roughly 25 per cent of the population is vaccinated and the Omicron variant was first detected, strains with a high R number will stand a better chance of taking hold.

But in a highly vaccinated population, strains that are better able to evade the vaccine will be more likely to dominate, even if they have a lower R number in unvaccinated people.

LESS SEVERE SYMPTOMS MAY FUEL SPREAD

So, would you expect a variant with less severe COVID-19 symptoms to thrive? It really depends on the trade-offs between symptoms and transmissibility.

If symptoms are less severe, people are less likely to come forward to be tested and therefore are less likely to isolate. Some may not realise they have COVID-19 at all.

Therefore, a strain with low virulence, or a lower ability to cause severe symptoms in the body, may be better able to transmit to more people than highly virulent strains.

On the other hand, as appeared to be the case for the Delta variant, some variants can cause higher viraemia than others – meaning higher levels of the virus within infected people’s bodies.

The more virus present, the more likely the person is to be able to successfully transmit the disease. This is because of the dose-response relationship – the higher the infective dose, the more likely it is an infection will result.

Again, all things being equal (without yet knowing the details of exactly how specific mutations behave), higher levels of viraemia are likely to lead to more severe symptoms.

It is not clearly understood yet why the Omicron variant is apparently highly transmissible at least in the African context, so at this stage we don’t know whether it produces higher levels of viraemia than other strains.

Viral transmission is a complex multistage process, so many things may be responsible for Omicron’s high transmission rate.

OMICRON MAY BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY IN HIGHLY VACCINATED POPULATIONS

What happens next is yet to be determined. Experts will look for more information on the transmissibility of the Omicron variant, the level of viraemia it generates and the extent to which it is capable of evading either the existing vaccines or immune responses resulting from previous infection.

The Omicron variant may well behave quite differently in a highly vaccinated population – such as we now have in Australia – compared with a population with very low levels of vaccination as is the case in most of sub-Saharan Africa.

Nevertheless, the emergence of this new variant emphasises an effective vaccination effort worldwide is necessary to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hamish McCallum is the Director of Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security at Griffith University. This commentary first appeared on The Conversation.