Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Commentary

Commentary: Clean energy has won the economic race

Forecasters have underestimated the falling costs and accelerating pace of deployment for renewables, leading to trillions invested in energy infrastructure that is not only more expensive, but damaging to us and the planet, says CEO Jules Kortenhorst.

Commentary: Clean energy has won the economic race

This aerial file photo taken on May 17, 2021, shows windmills at the Alexigros wind farm near Cyprus' southern coastal city of Larnaca. (Photo: AFP/Roy Issa)

DENVER, Colorado: For decades, we at the Rocky Mountain Institute (now RMI) have argued that the transition to clean energy will cost less and proceed faster than governments, firms and many analysts expect.

In recent years, this outlook has been fully vindicated: Costs of renewables have consistently fallen faster than expected, while deployment has proceeded more rapidly than predicted, thereby reducing costs even further.

Thanks to this virtuous cycle, renewables have broken through. And now, new analyses from two authoritative research institutions have added to the mountain of data showing that a rapid clean energy transition is the least expensive path forward.

Policymakers, business leaders and financial institutions urgently need to consider the promising implications of this development.

With the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) in Glasgow underway, it is imperative that world leaders recognise that achieving the Paris climate agreement’s 1.5 degrees Celsius warming target is not about making sacrifices; it is about seizing opportunities.

The negotiation process must be reframed so that it is less about burden-sharing and more about a lucrative race to deploy cleaner, cheaper energy technologies.

President Joe Biden, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and South Korea's President Moon Jae-in at the COP26 UN Climate Summit. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

With the world already suffering from climate-driven extreme weather events, a rapid clean energy transition also has the virtue of being the safest route ahead.

If we fail at this historic task, we risk not only wasting trillions of dollars but also pushing civilisation further down a dangerous and potentially catastrophic path of climate change.

One can only guess why forecasters have, for decades, underestimated the falling costs and accelerating pace of deployment for renewables.

But the results are clear: Bad predictions have underwritten trillions of dollars of investment in energy infrastructure that is not only more expensive but also more damaging to human society and all life on the planet.

We now face what may be our last chance to correct for decades of missed opportunities. Either we will continue to waste trillions more on a system that is killing us, or we will move rapidly to the cheaper, cleaner, more advanced energy solutions of the future.

It's a "Code Red" for climate action, but will nations step up their ambitions in Glasgow? We dive into the COP26 agenda on The Climate Conversations:

HOW THE RAPID CLEAN ENERGY TRANSITION WILL WORK

New studies have shed light on how a rapid clean energy transition would work.

In the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) report The Renewable Spring, lead author Kingsmill Bond shows that renewables are following the same exponential growth curve as past technology revolutions, hewing to predictable and well-understood patterns.

Accordingly, Bond notes that the energy transition will continue to attract capital and build its own momentum. But this process can and should be supported to ensure that it proceeds as quickly as possible.

Policymakers who want to drive change must create an enabling environment for the optimal flow of capital. Bond clearly lays out the sequence of steps that this process entails.

(Graphic: Jules Kortenhorst)

Examining past energy revolutions reveals several important insights. First, capital is attracted to technological disruptions, and tends to flow to the areas of growth and opportunity associated with the start of these revolutions.

As a result, once a new set of technologies passes its gestation period, capital becomes widely available.

Second, financial markets draw forward change. As capital moves, it speeds up the process of change by allocating new capital to growth industries, and by withdrawing it from those in decline.

The current signals from financial markets show that we are in the first phase of a predictable energy transition, with spectacular outperformance by new energy sectors and the de-rating of the fossil fuel sector.

This is the point where wise policymakers can step in to establish the necessary institutional framework to accelerate the energy transition and realise the economic benefits of building local clean energy supply chains.

As we can see from market trends highlighted in the IRENA report, the shift is already well underway.

Performance of clean energy and fossil energy stocks in 2020. (Source: Carbon Tracker based on Carlota Perez; Graphic: Jules Kortenhorst)

IMMENSE SAVINGS IN CLEAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS

Reinforcing the findings from the IRENA report, a recent analysis from the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) at the Oxford Martin School shows that a rapid transition to clean energy solutions will save trillions of dollars, in addition to keeping the world aligned with the Paris agreement’s 1.5 degrees Celsius goal.

A slower deployment path would be financially costlier than a faster one and would incur significantly higher climate costs from avoidable disasters and deteriorating living conditions.

Owing to the power of exponential growth, an accelerated path for renewables is eminently achievable.

The INET Oxford report finds that if the deployment of solar, wind, batteries and hydrogen electrolysers continues to follow exponential growth trends for another decade, the world will be on track to achieve net-zero-emissions energy generation within 25 years.

In its own coverage of the report, Bloomberg News suggests as a “conservative estimate” that a rapid clean energy transition would save US$26 trillion compared with continuing with today’s energy system.

After all, the more solar and wind power we build, the greater the price reductions for those technologies.

Moreover, in his own response to the INET Oxford study, Bill McKibben of 350.org points out that the cost of fossil fuels will not fall, and that any technological learning curve advantage for oil and gas will be offset by the fact that the world’s easy-access reserves have already been exploited.

Hence, he warns that precisely because solar and wind will save consumers money, the fossil-fuel industry will continue to try to slow down the transition in order to mitigate its own losses.

We must not allow any further delay. At COP26, it is essential that world leaders understand that we already have cleaner, cheaper energy solutions ready to deploy now.

Hitting our 1.5 degrees Celsius target is not about making sacrifices; it is about seizing opportunities. If we get to work now, we can save trillions of dollars and avert the climate devastation that otherwise will be visited upon our children and grandchildren.

Jules Kortenhorst is CEO of RMI. PROJECT SYNDICATE

Source: Others/el

Advertisement

Also worth reading

Advertisement